SMART 2013: Experimental and numerical assessment of the dynamic behavior by shaking table tests of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure subjected to high intensity ground motions

As part of a large research program launched and funded by the French Atomic Energy and Sustainable Energies Commission (CEA) and Electricite De France (EDF), partially supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and entitled ‘‘Seismic design and best-estimate Methods Assessment for Reinforced concrete buildings subjected to Torsion and nonlinear effect (SMART)”, a series of shaking table tests on a ¼-scale 3-story reinforced concrete model characterized by a strong asymmetry has been carried out in July 2013. The seismic loading was composed of three test sequences having different peak ground accelerations (PGA): the design level signal (PGA equal to 0.2 g), the Northridge main shock signal (PGA equal to 1.78 g) and a Northridge aftershock (PGA equal to 0.33 g). In this paper, the main experimental results, compared with outputs from a numerical study carried out by CEA, are presented and discussed. The following conclusions were reached for each seismic test sequence: (i) only small nonlinearities appeared and both displacement and acceleration-based quantities were properly estimated by the model; (ii) the specimen exhibited moderate nonlinearities in case of PGA higher than 4 or 5 times the design PGA; displacements were numerically underestimated whereas maximum acceleration-based quantities were captured rather well; (iii) the fact that no additional damage was monitored during this seismic sequence was pointed out only by the experimental measurements but also by the numerical outputs, leading to show that this aftershock signal did not induce any further damage. Given the aforementioned observations, it was possible to carry out a robustness analysis based upon two damage indicators: the eigenfrequency shift and the inter-story drift. Apart from the issues of the most meaningful robustness indicator and the choice of damage thresholds that came up, it is shown that the specimen can be qualified as being robust.

[1]  Gottfried Grünthal,et al.  L'echelle macrosismique européenne = European macroseismic scale 1998 : (EMS-98) , 2001 .

[2]  F. Ragueneau,et al.  Continuum damage mechanics based model for quasi brittle materials subjected to cyclic loadings: Formulation, numerical implementation and applications , 2013 .

[3]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Shake-Table Test of a Full-Scale 7-Story Building Slice. Phase I: Rectangular Wall , 2011 .

[4]  Thomas L. Davis,et al.  A balanced cross-section of the 1994 Northridge earthquake, southern California , 1994, Nature.

[5]  Jack R. Benjamin,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Assemblies , 1960 .

[6]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Shake Table Testing of Slender RC Shear Walls Subjected to Eastern North America Seismic Ground Motions , 2012 .

[7]  Paolo Emilio Pinto,et al.  SLENDER RC COMPRESSED MEMBERS IN BIAXIAL BENDING , 1977 .

[8]  パシフィックコンサルタンツ総合研究所都市防災室 1994 Northridge Earthquake 被害調査報告書 , 1994 .

[9]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Static load cycle testing of a low-aspect-ratio four-inch wall, TRG-type structure, TRG-5-4 (1. 0, 0. 56) , 1990 .

[10]  Henry G. Russell,et al.  Strength of Low-Rise Structural Walls , 1980 .

[11]  Nicholas J. Carino,et al.  1994 Northridge earthquake , 1994 .

[12]  P. Gergely Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete structures and components for application to nuclear facilities , 1984 .

[13]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[14]  A. C. Fischer-Cripps Data acquisition project , 2002 .

[15]  P. Sollogoub,et al.  Seismic Behaviour of Piping Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Vladimir Cervenka Inelastic finite element analysis of reinforced concrete panels under in-plane loads , 1970 .

[17]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  SMART 2008: Shaking table tests on an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure and seismic margins assessment , 2015 .

[18]  L. Rayleigh VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity , 1917 .

[19]  Rogerio Bairrao,et al.  Dynamic Interaction Between the Shaking Table and the Specimen During Seismic Tests , 2010 .

[20]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table , 2010 .

[21]  R. Lindsay On the Pressure Developed in a Liquid During the Collapse of a Spherical Cavity (1917) , 1970 .

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Static and simulated seismic testing of the TRG-7 through -16 shear wall structures , 1991 .

[23]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  Experimental characterization and modeling of energy dissipation in reinforced concrete beams subjected to cyclic loading , 2013 .

[24]  Vitelmo V. Bertero The response of shear walls subjected to dynamic loads , 1957 .

[25]  W. E. Dunwoody,et al.  Analysis and tests on small-scale shear walls. FY-82 final report , 1985 .

[26]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Seismic Category I Structures Program: Final report, FY 1983-84 , 1987 .

[27]  Filip C. Filippou,et al.  Simulation of the shaking table test of a seven‐story shear wall building , 2009 .

[28]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Lessons Learned from Seismic Analysis of a Seven-Story Concrete Test Building , 2010 .

[29]  Michael D. Kotsovos,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls: Strength, Deformation Characteristics, and Failure Mechanism , 1990 .

[30]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Slender Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Shaking Table Tests Under High-Frequency Ground Motions , 2013 .

[31]  J M Hanson,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH OF LOW-RISE WALLS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS , 1976 .

[32]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Static load cycle testing of a very low-aspect-ratio six-inch wall TRG-type structure TRG-6-6 (0. 27, 0. 50) , 1990 .

[33]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  SMART 2008: Overview, synthesis and lessons learned from the International Benchmark , 2016 .

[34]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Ductility in Earthquake Resisting Squat Shearwalls , 1982 .

[35]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  System Identification Study of a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice Tested on the UCSD-NEES Shake Table , 2011 .