Tensile and compressive properties of healthy and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease affecting articular cartilage and the underlying bone, resulting from many biological and mechanical interacting factors which change the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cells and lead to increasing levels of cartilage degeneration, like softening, fibrillation, ulceration and cartilage loss. The early diagnosis of the disease is fundamental to prevent pain, further tissue degeneration and reduce hospital costs. Although morphological modifications can be detected by modern non-invasive diagnostic techniques, they may not be evident in the early stages of OA. The mechanical properties of articular cartilage are related to its composition and structure and are sensitive to even small changes in the ECM that could occur in early OA. The aim of the present study was to compare the mechanical properties of healthy and OA cartilage using a combined experimental-numerical approach. Experimental assessments consisted of step wise confined and unconfined compression and tension stress relaxation tests on disks (for compression) or strips (for tension) of cartilage obtained from human femoral heads discarded from the operating room after total hip replacement. The numerical model was based on the biphasic theory and included the tension-compression non-linearity. Considering OA samples vs normal samples, the static compressive modulus was 55-68% lower, the permeability was 60-80% higher, the dynamic compressive modulus was 59-64% lower, the static tension modulus was 72-83% lower. The model successfully simulated the experimental tests performed on healthy and OA cartilage and was used in combination with the experimental tests to evaluate the role of different ECM components in the mechanical response of normal and OA cartilage.

[1]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  Osteoarthritic changes in the biochemical composition of thumb carpometacarpal joint cartilage and correlation with biomechanical properties. , 2000, The Journal of hand surgery.

[2]  Benedicte Vanwanseele,et al.  A review on the mechanical quality of articular cartilage - implications for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  H J Mankin,et al.  Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. , 1998, Instructional course lectures.

[4]  B. Weightman,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical properties of human articular cartilage from the femoral head after subcapital fracture. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  M. Freeman,et al.  Correlations between stiffness and the chemical constituents of cartilage on the human femoral head. , 1970, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[6]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of computational models in the search for the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of articular cartilage. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  G E Kempson,et al.  The effects of selective matrix degradation on the short-term compressive properties of adult human articular cartilage. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Poroelastic numerical modelling of natural and engineered cartilage based on in vitro tests. , 2006, Biorheology.

[9]  John E. Scott,et al.  Cartilage elasticity resides in shape module decoran and aggrecan sumps of damping fluid: implications in osteoarthrosis , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Adams,et al.  Mechanical properties of articular cartilage in knees with unicompartmental osteoarthritis. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  V C Mow,et al.  Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Putz,et al.  Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three‐dimensional magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (3D MR‐CCM) , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Joint Injury in Young Adults and Risk for Subsequent Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  J. Weiss,et al.  Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity , 1996 .

[15]  V C Mow,et al.  Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Ming Ding,et al.  Changes in the stiffness of the human tibial cartilage-bone complex in early-stage osteoarthrosis. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.