Numerical investigation of Membrane Dephlegmation: A hybrid pervaporation–distillation process for ethanol recovery

Abstract Ethanol is a renewable fuel that could help alleviate our dependence on fossil fuels to supply energy. Ethanol can be produced through the fermentation of sugars obtained from a variety of biomass. However, the energy intensive nature of the ethanol separation process limits the usefulness of ethanol as a biofuel. Membrane Dephlegmation is a hybrid pervaporation–distillation process that could help improve the efficiency of ethanol recovery. As opposed to most other hybrid pervaporation–distillation processes, Membrane Dephlegmation combines both processes in a single unit. In this investigation, a mathematical model of the Membrane Dephlegmation process was used to carry out a parametric study for important operating conditions and geometric variables. The impacts of feed flow rate, feed concentration, permeate pressure, reflux ratio, membrane length and membrane diameter on separation efficiency were studied. McCabe–Thiele plots were used to compare the performance of Membrane Dephlegmation to conventional distillation. Membrane Dephlegmation was shown to be more efficient than distillation, yielding ethanol concentrations above the ethanol–water azeotrope for similar operating conditions. It was also demonstrated that the inclusion of pervaporation in the hybrid process shifts the operating line below the parity line on the McCabe–Thiele plots, leading to improved separation performance relative to distillation.

[1]  T. Melin,et al.  Influence of operation parameters on the separation of mixtures by pervaporation and vapor permeation with inorganic membranes. Part 1: Dehydration of solvents , 2005 .

[2]  Yanshuo Li,et al.  Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of a&b-oriented zeolite T membranes and their pervaporation properties , 2009 .

[3]  Jules Thibault,et al.  A new hybrid membrane separation process for enhanced ethanol recovery: Process description and numerical studies , 2012 .

[4]  J. Smith,et al.  Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics , 1949 .

[5]  Carlos A Cardona,et al.  Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Yanshuo Li,et al.  Hydrothermal stability of LTA zeolite membranes in pervaporation , 2007 .

[7]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[8]  G. Wozny,et al.  A new energy-integrated pervaporation distillation approach , 2008 .

[9]  Leland M. Vane,et al.  A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes , 2005 .

[10]  R. Baker,et al.  Experimental validation of hybrid distillation‐vapor permeation process for energy efficient ethanol–water separation , 2009 .

[11]  Ross Taylor,et al.  Multicomponent mass transfer , 1993 .

[12]  Frank Lipnizki,et al.  Pervaporation-based hybrid process: a review of process design, applications and economics , 1999 .

[13]  C. Geankoplis,et al.  Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles , 2003 .

[14]  Endre Rev,et al.  Optimization of hybrid ethanol dehydration systems , 2002 .

[15]  Heat supply and reduction of polarization effects in pervaporation by two-phase feed , 2006 .

[16]  Günter Wozny,et al.  Reduction of Energy Consumption in the Process Industry Using a Heat-Integrated Hybrid Distillation Pervaporation Process , 2009 .

[17]  Leland M. Vane,et al.  Membrane‐assisted vapor stripping: energy efficient hybrid distillation–vapor permeation process for alcohol–water separation , 2008 .

[18]  Jan Kühnert,et al.  Dewatering of ethanol by pervaporation and vapour permeation with industrial scale NaA-membranes , 2006 .

[19]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[20]  J. Thibault,et al.  Correlation of the Transport Properties for the Ethanol-Water System Using Neural Networks , 2008 .

[21]  C. Yaws.  Chemical properties handbook , 1999 .