Lesion detectability in stereoscopically viewed digital breast tomosynthesis projection images: a model observer study with anthropomorphic computational breast phantoms

Stereoscopic views of 3D breast imaging data may better reveal the 3D structures of breasts, and potentially improve the detection of breast lesions. The imaging geometry of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) lends itself naturally to stereo viewing because a stereo pair can be easily formed by two projection images with a reasonable separation angle for perceiving depth. This simulation study attempts to mimic breast lesion detection on stereo viewing of a sequence of stereo pairs of DBT projection images. 3D anthropomorphic computational breast phantoms were scanned by a simulated DBT system, and spherical signals were inserted into different breast regions to imitate the presence of breast lesions. The regions of interest (ROI) had different local anatomical structures and consequently different background statistics. The projection images were combined into a sequence of stereo pairs, and then presented to a stereo matching model observer for determining lesion presence. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as the figure of merit in evaluation, and the SNR from the stack of reconstructed slices was considered as the benchmark. We have shown that: 1) incorporating local anatomical backgrounds may improve lesion detectability relative to ignoring location-dependent image characteristics. The SNR was lower for the ROIs with the higher local power-law-noise coefficient β. 2) Lesion detectability may be inferior on stereo viewing of projection images relative to conventional viewing of reconstructed slices, but further studies are needed to confirm this observation.

[1]  Lin Ma,et al.  Comparison of Subregional Breast Density with Whole Breast Density , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection. , 2011, Medical physics.

[3]  Mia K. Markey,et al.  A stereo matching model observer for stereoscopic viewing of 3D medical images , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Comparing observer models and feature selection methods for a task-based statistical assessment of digital breast tomsynthesis in reconstruction space , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Disparity Estimation on Stereo Mammograms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Nooshin Kiarashi,et al.  Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation. , 2016, Medical physics.

[7]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[8]  Isabel dos Santos Silva,et al.  The spatial distribution of radiodense breast tissue: a longitudinal study , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  Investigation on location-dependent detectability of a small mass for digital breast tomosynthesis evaluation , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Mia K. Markey,et al.  Computational assessment of stereoscopic viewing a sequence of stereo pairs of breast tomosynthesis projection images , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Zhenxue Jing,et al.  Local versus Whole Breast Volumetric Breast Density Assessments and Implications , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[14]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Comparison of Channel Methods and Observer Models for the Task-Based Assessment of Multi-Projection Imaging in the Presence of Structured Anatomical Noise , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  A. Burgess.  Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[16]  H. Hirschmüller.  Accurate and Efficient Stereo Processing by Semi-Global Matching and Mutual Information , 2005, CVPR.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms. , 2015, Medical physics.

[18]  J. Boone,et al.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Xin He,et al.  Model Observers in Medical Imaging Research , 2013, Theranostics.

[20]  Ewout Vansteenkiste,et al.  Channelized Hotelling observers for the assessment of volumetric imaging data sets. , 2011, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  W. D. Wright.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[22]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.