Some components and consequences of a babyface.

Physical measurements and subjective ratings of various facial features were obtained for 20 adult male stimulus faces. The faces were also rated on five personality dimensions, physical attractiveness, age, and babyfacedness. The physical measurements of large, round eyes, high eyebrows, and a small chin each yielded the perception of a babyish facial appearance, and a weighted linear composite derived from the measures of eye size and chin width accounted for 57% of the variance in ratings of babyfacedness. Both this measured composite and subjective babyfacedness ratings were positively correlated with perceptions of a male stimulus person's naivete, honesty, kindness, and warmth. Analyses revealed that these relations were not attributable to the effects of perceived age or attractiveness. The results are discussed within a theoretical framework, which suggests that the adaptive value of recognizing natural covariations between certain appearance cues and behavioral affordances may provide an explanation for some appearance-based stereotyping.

[1]  B. Gillen,et al.  Physical Attractiveness , 1981 .

[2]  R. Andrew.  The origins of facial expressions. , 1965, Scientific American.

[3]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  A Psychophysical Study of “Cuteness” , 1960 .

[4]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of growth in three dimensions , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  C. Keating,et al.  A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness , 1981 .

[6]  Thomas R. Alley,et al.  Head shape and the perception of cuteness. , 1981 .

[7]  L. Z. McArthur,et al.  Impressions of baby-faced adults. , 1984 .

[8]  P. Mussen,et al.  Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology , 1972 .

[9]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[10]  M. Manis.  Cognitive Social Psychology , 1977 .

[11]  Hiram E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness , 1979 .

[12]  John E. Muthard,et al.  Personalities in Faces: IV. A Descriptive Analysis of the Perception of Women's Faces and the Identification of Some Physiognomic Determinants , 1955 .

[13]  T. Struhsaker.  Social behaviour of mother and infant vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) , 1971 .

[14]  A. Kefalas,et al.  What of the Child? , 1935, History of Education Quarterly.

[15]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt.  Ethology, the biology of behavior , 1970 .

[16]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  The perception of human growth. , 1980, Scientific American.

[17]  B. T. Gardner,et al.  Shapes of Figures Identified as a Baby's Head , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  J. Laidlaw,et al.  ANATOMY OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1967, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[19]  Gerald R. Adams,et al.  Physical Attractiveness Research , 1977 .

[20]  W. Yule.  PSYCHOLOGY: Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology , 1972, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  Sarah Hall Sternglanz,et al.  Adult preferences for infantile facial features: An ethological approach , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. , 1981 .

[23]  W. Bevan,et al.  Personalities in faces. I. An experiment in social perceiving. , 1954, Genetic psychology monographs.

[24]  Van Hooff,et al.  The Facial Displays of the Catarrhine Monkeys and Apes. , 1967 .