Does the Use of Automated Fetal Biometry Improve Clinical Work Flow Efficiency?

This study was designed to compare the work flow efficiency of manual measurements of 5 fetal parameters with a novel technique that automatically measures these parameters from 2-dimensional sonograms. This prospective study included 200 singleton pregnancies between 15 and 40 weeks' gestation. Patients were randomly allocated to either manual (n = 100) or automatic (n = 100) fetal biometry. The automatic measurement was performed using a commercially available software application. A digital video recorder captured all on-screen activity associated with the sonographic examination. The examination time and number of steps required to obtain fetal measurements were compared between manual and automatic methods. The mean time required to obtain the biometric measurements was significantly shorter using the automated technique than the manual approach (P < .001 for all comparisons). Similarly, the mean number of steps required to perform these measurements was significantly fewer with automatic measurements compared to the manual technique (P < .001). In summary, automated biometry reduced the examination time required for standard fetal measurements. This approach may improve work flow efficiency in busy obstetric sonography practices.

[1]  J. Struyven,et al.  Ultrasonic evaluation of fetal limb growth. , 1981, Radiology.

[2]  Thomas D Shipp,et al.  Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  W. Ott,et al.  Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Altered Fetal Growth by Use of a Normal Ultrasonic Fetal Weight Curve , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  R B Mercer,et al.  Occupational health hazards to the ultrasonographer and their possible prevention. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re‐evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real‐time ultrasound. , 1982, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  A. Smith,et al.  Musculoskeletal pain in cardiac ultrasonographers: results of a random survey. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  V Chalana,et al.  Automatic fetal head measurements from sonographic images. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[8]  W. Ott,et al.  Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  B. Rahmatullah,et al.  Analysis of semi-automated method for femur length measurement from foetal ultrasound , 2009, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. , 1991, Radiology.

[11]  S. E. Alam,et al.  The correlation between ultrasonic manual and automatic measurements of foetal head and abdominal circumferences. , 2007, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[12]  S D Pathak,et al.  Interactive automatic fetal head measurements from ultrasound images using multimedia computer technology. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  L Chik,et al.  Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head: computer versus operator , 1991, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements , 2009, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal Femur Length: A Critical Reevaluation of the Relationship to Menstrual Age , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Jinglu Tan,et al.  Automated fetal head detection and measurement in ultrasound images by iterative randomized Hough transform. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  P Jeanty,et al.  Automatic measurements of fetal long bones. A feasibility study. , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[19]  L Bevilacqua,et al.  Work-related musculoskeletal complaints in sonologists. , 1999, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[20]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Ott Wj The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. , 1988 .