A multi-level FREAK DTN: Taking care of disconnected nodes in the IoT

Crowdsensing is, for a few years, a hot topic. Until now, research on crowdsensing mainly focused on scenarios with devices such as smartphones with huge memory and high computive skills. With the development of the Internet of Things (IoT), crowdsensing can be envisaged with other constraints. Indeed, some IoT nodes are mobile but with limitations about storage and processing capabilities, then connectivity disruptions might occur between the nodes. These issues are tackled by a Disruption Tolerant Networking architecture. In this article, we focus on a subset of IoT, Mobile Sensing Networks (MSN). We propose then, a mechanism which respects the constraints of the nodes and maintains high performance. This mechanism, the multi-level FREAK, uses the mean frequency of contacts with the destination. The metrics drives the transmission. Since some nodes might not meet the destination nor nodes meeting the destination, we had the idea of a multi-level metrics to allow these “disconnected” nodes to transmit data to the destination. We evaluate our proposal through simulations based on several real mobility traces. Our solution outperforms reference replication and quota-based DTN solutions.

[1]  Pan Hui,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset cambridge/haggle (v.2009-05-29) , 2009 .

[2]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[3]  Jörg Ott,et al.  The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation , 2009, SIMUTools 2009.

[4]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic Routing Protocol for Intermittently Connected Networks , 2012, RFC.

[5]  Robin Kravets,et al.  Encounter-Based Routing in DTNs , 2009, INFOCOM.

[6]  Christophe Diot,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset thlab/sigcomm2009 (v.2012-07-15) , 2012 .

[7]  Serge Fdida,et al.  Beyond contact predictions in mobile opportunistic networks , 2014, 2014 11th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[8]  Evangelos Papapetrou,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset tools/simulate/uoi/adyton (v.2016-04-21) , 2016 .

[9]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset mit/reality (v.2005-07-01) , 2005 .

[10]  Elena Pagani,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset unimi/pmtr (v.2008-12-01) , 2008 .

[11]  Carles Gomez,et al.  Urban Automation Networks: Current and Emerging Solutions for Sensed Data Collection and Actuation in Smart Cities , 2015, Sensors.

[12]  Scott C. Burleigh,et al.  Bundle Protocol Specification , 2007, RFC.

[13]  Hervé Rivano,et al.  Experiments and results on DTN for IOT III Urbanet collaboration , 2015 .

[14]  Brian Gallagher,et al.  MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[15]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks , 2005, WDTN '05.

[16]  Young-Joo Suh,et al.  A link contact duration-based routing protocol in delay-tolerant networks , 2013, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  Emmanuel Chaput,et al.  FREAK DTN: Frequency Routing, Encounters And Keenness for DTN , 2014, 2014 IFIP Wireless Days (WD).

[18]  Hervé Rivano,et al.  Optimal Deployment of Wireless Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Monitoring , 2015, 2015 24th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).