Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation

Spatial navigation deficits in older adults are well documented. These findings are based on experimental paradigms that require using a joystick or keyboard to navigate a virtual desktop environment. In the present study, cognitively normal young and older adults navigated in each of two virtual reality (VR) conditions: a desktop VR condition which required using a mouse and keyboard to navigate and an immersive and ambulatory VR condition which permitted unrestricted locomotion. Consistent with past studies, older adults navigated to target locations less precisely than did younger individuals in the desktop condition. These age differences were significantly attenuated when tested in the immersive environment. Additional analyses indicated that older adults showed a preference for route-based search strategies compared to young adults, regardless of condition. These findings suggest that certain aspects of navigation performance in older adults are improved in paradigms that offer a fuller range of enriched and naturalistic cues.

[1]  N. Charness,et al.  A Grand Challenge for Psychology: Reducing the Age-Related Digital Divide , 2022, Current directions in psychological science.

[2]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Older Adults Show Reduced Spatial Precision but Preserved Strategy-Use During Spatial Navigation Involving Body-Based Cues , 2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

[3]  Arne D Ekstrom,et al.  Landmarks: A solution for spatial navigation and memory experiments in virtual reality , 2020, Behavior Research Methods.

[4]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Desktop versus immersive virtual environments: effects on spatial learning , 2020, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[5]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Are Evident by Midlife and Differ by Sex , 2020, Psychological science.

[6]  Paul F. Hill,et al.  Age differences in retrieval-related reinstatement reflect age-related dedifferentiation at encoding , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  Michael J. Starrett,et al.  How Much of What We Learn in Virtual Reality Transfers to Real-World Navigation? , 2020, Multisensory research.

[8]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  A Modality-Independent Network Underlies the Retrieval of Large-Scale Spatial Environments in the Human Brain , 2019, Neuron.

[9]  L. L. Bologna,et al.  Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Aging and spatial cues influence the updating of navigational memories , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Jakub Hort,et al.  Spatial navigation deficits — overlooked cognitive marker for preclinical Alzheimer disease? , 2018, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[13]  Weimin Mou,et al.  The limits of boundaries: unpacking localization and cognitive mapping relative to a boundary , 2017, Psychological Research.

[14]  A. Ekstrom,et al.  Close but no cigar: Spatial precision deficits following medial temporal lobe lesions provide novel insight into theoretical models of navigation and memory , 2018, Hippocampus.

[15]  H. Spiers,et al.  Global Determinants of Navigation Ability , 2017, Current Biology.

[16]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2018 .

[17]  Jimmy Y. Zhong,et al.  The Application of a Rodent-Based Morris Water Maze (MWM) Protocol to an Investigation of Age-Related Differences in Human Spatial Learning , 2017, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Human spatial navigation: representations across dimensions and scales , 2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[19]  C. Barnes,et al.  The Aging Navigational System , 2017, Neuron.

[20]  Daniel Q. Sun,et al.  Does Sensory Function Decline Independently or Concomitantly with Age? Data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging , 2016, Journal of aging research.

[21]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  Analysis of Factorial Experiments , 2015 .

[22]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  afex – Analysis of Factorial EXperiments , 2015 .

[23]  T. Wolbers,et al.  How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[24]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  T. Wolbers,et al.  How age-related strategy switching deficits affect wayfinding in complex environments , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[26]  Jakub Hort,et al.  Spatial navigation in young versus older adults , 2013, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[27]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Aging specifically impairs switching to an allocentric navigational strategy , 2012, Front. Ag. Neurosci..

[28]  Joseph A. Sindone,et al.  Age differences in virtual environment and real world path integration , 2012, Front. Ag. Neurosci..

[29]  Michael C Schubert,et al.  Decline in Semicircular Canal and Otolith Function With Age , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[30]  S. Moffat,et al.  Effects of age on navigation strategy , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[31]  D. Head,et al.  Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  Scott D. Moffat,et al.  Age differences in visual path integration , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  S. Moffat.  Aging and Spatial Navigation: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? , 2009, Neuropsychology Review.

[34]  N. Raz,et al.  Extrahippocampal contributions to age differences in human spatial navigation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  S. Shaffer,et al.  Aging of the Somatosensory System: A Translational Perspective , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[36]  S. Resnick,et al.  Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[37]  Simon Lessels,et al.  For Efficient Navigational Search, Humans Require Full Physical Movement, but Not a Rich Visual Scene , 2006, Psychological science.

[38]  G. Allen,et al.  Aging and path integration skill: Kinesthetic and vestibular contributions to wayfinding , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  S. Resnick,et al.  Effects of age on virtual environment place navigation and allocentric cognitive mapping. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  S. Resnick,et al.  Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task , 2001, Neurobiology of Aging.

[41]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[43]  M. D. Lindner.  Reliability, Distribution, and Validity of Age-Related Cognitive Deficits in the Morris Water Maze , 1997, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[44]  C. Barnes,et al.  Age-related decrease in cholinergic synaptic transmission in three hippocampal subfields , 1996, Neurobiology of Aging.

[45]  R. Reitan,et al.  The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation , 1993 .

[46]  K. Kirasic,et al.  Spatial cognition and behavior in young and elderly adults: implications for learning new environments. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[47]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Hippocampal representation in place learning , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  D. Delis,et al.  The California verbal learning test , 2016 .

[49]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[50]  F. Carp.  Handbook of the psychology of aging. , 1977 .

[51]  D. Crockett.  A comparison of empirically derived groups of aphasic patients on the Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia. , 1977, Journal of clinical psychology.

[52]  Arthur L. Benton,et al.  Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease , 1968 .

[53]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[54]  A. Rey.  L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). , 1941 .