The treatment of lubrication forces in boundary integral equations

Despite their many advantages over other numerical methods, boundary integral formulations still fail to provide accurate predictions of mesoscale motion in dense suspensions of rigid particles because the nearly singular flow between surfaces in close proximity cannot be resolved accurately. A procedure for incorporating analytical solutions for the lubrication flow within a large-scale boundary integral equation method is shown. Although the method is applied to the case of spherical particles, in conjunction with the completed double layer boundary integral equation, it can be developed further to treat more complex geometries and can be adapted to other numerical techniques. In contrast to other apparently similar approaches, the present method does not resort to effective medium approximations, and in principle retains all the advantages typical of boundary integral approaches. The framework also allows for forces other than those due to hydrodynamic lubrication between particles, provided that they are a linear function of the relative velocity or at least can be linearized; for example, forces due to sub-continuum fluid behaviour or forces resulting from surface chemistry. It is shown using several benchmarks that the relative motion between two particles in various flows is captured accurately, both statically and dynamically, in situations where uncorrected simulations fail. Moreover, the computational effort is reduced substantially by the application of the method.

[1]  R. Glowinski,et al.  A fictitious domain method for Dirichlet problem and applications , 1994 .

[2]  Sangtae Kim Chapter 1 – Microhydrodynamic Phenomena , 1991 .

[3]  F. Qi,et al.  Effective moduli of particulate solids: The completed double layer boundary element method with lubrication approximation , 2000 .

[4]  D. Wolf,et al.  Chaotic particle dynamics in viscous flows: the three-particle stokeslet problem , 1997 .

[5]  John F. Brady,et al.  The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  John F. Brady,et al.  Dynamic simulation of sheared suspensions. I. General method , 1984 .

[7]  Zhen-Xiang Gong,et al.  Review of:“Computational Methods for Free and Moving Boundary Problems in Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow”Editor: L.C. Wrobel and C.A. Brebbia Computational Mechanics Publications Southampton Boston Elsevier Applied Science London New York , 1994 .

[8]  M. Ingber,et al.  A numerical study of the lateral migration of spherical particles in Poiseuille flow , 1994 .

[9]  Alexander Z. Zinchenko,et al.  Effective conductivity of loaded granular materials by numerical simulation , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  The forces and couples acting on two nearly touching spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow , 1984 .

[11]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  Completed double layer boundary element method in elasticity and stokes flow: Distributed computing through PVM , 1994 .

[12]  R. G. Cox,et al.  The slow motion of two identical arbitrarily oriented spheres through a viscous fluid , 1966 .

[13]  Luiz C. Wrobel,et al.  Boundary Integral Methods in Fluid Mechanics , 1995 .

[14]  Howard H. Hu,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Langrangian-Eulerian technique , 2001 .

[15]  G. Batchelor,et al.  The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  L. Greengard,et al.  Integral Equation Methods for Stokes Flow and Isotropic Elasticity in the Plane , 1996 .

[17]  Sangtae Kim,et al.  Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications , 1991 .

[18]  Seppo Karrila,et al.  Parallel Computational Strategies for Hydrodynamic Interactions Between Rigid Particles of Arbitrary Shape in a Viscous Fluid , 1989 .

[19]  L. Frink,et al.  A molecular theory for surface forces adhesion measurements , 1997 .

[20]  R. G. Cox The motion of suspended particles almost in contact , 1974 .

[21]  L. A. Mondy,et al.  Direct second kind boundary integral formulation for Stokes flow problems , 1991 .

[22]  J. Telles,et al.  Third degree polynomial transformation for boundary element integrals: Further improvements , 1994 .

[23]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  Asymmetrical slow viscous fluid motions caused by the translation or rotation of two spheres. Part I: The determination of exact solutions for any values of the ratio of radii and separation parameters , 1970 .

[24]  G. B. Jeffery,et al.  The Motion of Two Spheres in a Viscous Fluid , 1926 .

[25]  Sangtae Kim,et al.  Microhydrodynamics of sharp corners and edges: Traction singularities , 1998 .

[26]  V. Rokhlin,et al.  Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Three Dimensions , 1988 .

[27]  Sangtae Kim,et al.  Microstructures in Elastic Media: Principles and Computational Methods , 1994 .

[28]  H. Brenner The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface , 1961 .

[29]  G. B. Jeffery On the Steady Rotation of a Solid of Revolution in a Viscous Fluid , 1915 .

[30]  A. Mammoli Towards a reliable method for predicting the rheological properties of multiphase fluids , 2002 .

[31]  E. J. Hinch,et al.  Shear-induced dispersion in a dilute suspension of rough spheres , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  J. Brady,et al.  Pressure-driven flow of suspensions: simulation and theory , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  John F. Brady,et al.  Rheology and microstructure in concentrated noncolloidal suspensions , 2002 .

[34]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[35]  Neelesh A. Patankar,et al.  Lift-off of a single particle in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids by direct numerical simulation , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  M. Ingber,et al.  Stokes flow around cylinders in a bounded two-dimensional domain using multipole-accelerated boundary element methods , 1999 .

[37]  John F. Brady,et al.  Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  John F. Brady,et al.  STOKESIAN DYNAMICS , 2006 .

[39]  Sarah L. Dance,et al.  Incorporation of lubrication effects into the force-coupling method for particulate two-phase flow , 2003 .

[40]  Sangtae Kim,et al.  A note on two boundary integral formulations for particle mobilities in Stokes flow , 1993 .

[41]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations , 1999 .

[42]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for flows around moving rigid bodies : Application to particulate flow , 1999 .

[43]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  Completed double layer boundary element method in elasticity and stokes flow: Distributed computing through PVM , 1993, Computational Mechanics.

[44]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Asymmetrical slow viscous fluid motions caused by the translation or rotation of two spheres. Part II: Asymptotic forms of the solutions when the minimum clearance between the spheres approaches zero , 1970 .

[45]  M. E. O'Neill,et al.  On the slow motion generated in a viscous fluid by the approach of a sphere to a plane wall or stationary sphere , 1969 .

[46]  Piet Hut,et al.  A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm , 1986, Nature.