Formation Control of Nonholonomic Vehicles Under Time Delayed Communications

This document considers the formation control problem for a group of nonholonomic mobile robots under time delayed communications. The agents are assumed to be working under a directed and fixed communication topology. A recently developed formation control technique, based on a consensus protocol for linear systems is revisited. The stability analysis of this control technique, in the domain of the time delays, is performed using the Cluster Treatment of Characteristic Roots paradigm under the Spectral Delay Space approach. This analysis leads to an exact declaration of the stability boundaries in the domain of the delays. This linear control law is adapted to the nonlinear dynamics of the nonholonomic carts by means of feedback linearization. Simulation results show the applicability of this method to the class of agents considered here. Note to Practitioners-The problem dealt with in this paper is the coordinated motion of a group of mobile robots. Without a leader or a central authority, the members of the team attempt to converge into a predefined formation by exchanging information about position and velocities among themselves. The particularity here is that the communication among agents is corrupted by two time delays. One delay is considered to affect the measurement of the position of the agents and the second the determination of their velocity. We present a methodology to study the effect of the delay in the stability of the formation. This technique allows an exact declaration of the delay compositions that guarantee convergence to the formation in a finite time. The methodology is applied to a group of nonholonomic differential drive mobile robots.

[1]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Formation control based on a consensus protocol under directed communications with two time delays , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[3]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Stability Robustness Analysis of Multiple Time- Delayed Systems Using “Building Block” Concept , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Nejat Olgac,et al.  “Delay Scheduling”: A New Concept for Stabilization in Multiple Delay Systems , 2005 .

[5]  Marilena Vendittelli,et al.  WMR control via dynamic feedback linearization: design, implementation, and experimental validation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[6]  Kim D. Listmann,et al.  Consensus for formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Guisheng Zhai,et al.  Towards consensus in networked non-holonomic systems , 2010 .

[8]  Veysel Gazi,et al.  Swarm Tracking Using Artificial Potentials and Sliding Mode Control , 2007 .

[9]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Stability Analysis for the Group Dynamics Consensus with Time Delayed Communications , 2012, Eur. J. Control.

[10]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  An Exact Method for the Stability Analysis of Linear Consensus Protocols With Time Delay , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Junping Du,et al.  Distributed control of multi‐agent systems with second‐order agent dynamics and delay‐dependent communications , 2008 .

[13]  Jay A. Farrell,et al.  Cooperative Control of Multiple Nonholonomic Mobile Agents , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Complete stability robustness of third-order LTI multiple time-delay systems , 2005, Autom..

[15]  Wei Ren,et al.  On Consensus Algorithms for Double-Integrator Dynamics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  A consensus protocol under directed communications with two time delays and delay scheduling , 2014, Int. J. Control.

[17]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[18]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Consensus analysis with large and multiple communication delays using spectral delay space concept , 2011, Int. J. Control.

[20]  Nejat Olgac,et al.  ‘Delay scheduling’, an unconventional use of time delay for trajectory tracking , 2007 .

[21]  Maarouf Saad,et al.  Cascade design for formation control of nonholonomic systems in chained form , 2011, J. Frankl. Inst..

[22]  R. W. Brockett,et al.  Asymptotic stability and feedback stabilization , 1982 .

[23]  P. Chebotarev,et al.  On of the Spectra of Nonsymmetric Laplacian Matrices , 2004, math/0508176.

[24]  Calin Belta,et al.  Abstraction and control for Groups of robots , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[25]  Gordon F. Royle,et al.  Algebraic Graph Theory , 2001, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[26]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Extended Kronecker Summation for Cluster Treatment of LTI Systems with Multiple Delays , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[27]  Yingmin Jia,et al.  Further results on decentralised coordination in networks of agents with second-order dynamics , 2009 .

[28]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Mapping Based Algorithm for Large-Scale Computation of Quasi-Polynomial Zeros , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[29]  R. Ordonez,et al.  Swarm Tracking Using Artificial Potentials and Sliding Mode Control , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[30]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[32]  Rifat Sipahi,et al.  An exact method for the stability analysis of time-delayed linear time-invariant (LTI) systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[33]  Ziyang Meng,et al.  Leaderless and Leader-Following Consensus With Communication and Input Delays Under a Directed Network Topology , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[34]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.