Breast texture synthesis and estimation of the role of the anatomy and tumor shape in the radiological detection process

Breast cancer is the most common, and the number one cause of death by cancer among women. However, when it is sufficiently early detected, heavy treatments can be avoided, and morbidity and mortality can be reduced. This is the reason why randomized clinical trials were started in the 60s, followed in the last decades by screening mammography national programs. The process of breast cancer detection in mammography is complex. Its understanding offers numerous challenges to radiologists and medical physicists. One way to apprehend it is to model this process step-by-step by performing psychophysical experiments with anatomical or synthetic images. In this approach, the images information content is controlled. Since the first experiments with synthetic images created with white noise and simple geometric signals, technical and computational improvements allowed to get ever closer to clinical realism for studying the mechanism of perception of a signal on a radiological image. The present work extends the list of tools that have been used until now in psychophysical experiments in mammography. It proposes a detailed statistical analysis of anatomical images, from which algorithms for breast density classification and realistic breast texture synthesis are developed. In a second phase, psychophysical experiments with simple signals and benign or malignant masses combined with anatomical or synthetic backgrounds are presented. The performance of human observers is analyzed as a function of parameters such as background type, signal type, or uncertainty about the size or the shape of the signal. These results are compared to that of existing or adapted models from the literature, and the different models are evaluated in their ability to predict the performance of human observers for the detection of lesions in such conditions. Each step of this project focused on the objective and reproducible aspect of the image evaluation or of the observer performance. Controlled yet realistic conditions ensure the robustness of the results, as well as their clinical adaptability. Among the main results, synthetic mammographic texture images have been generated and validated. They provide a virtually unlimited database of images with demonstrated visual and statistical realism. Concerning the analysis of the human observers' performance, this work shows that they are sensitive to uncertainty about the signal size but not about its shape, that they use similar detection strategies with real and synthetic images, and that they are mainly sensitive to the anatomical fluctuations in the immediate area around the signal location. These effects, as well as the performance level of human observers for the detection tasks under consideration, could be reproduced by models taking into account human visual system characteristics. The conclusions of this work will be able to guide future studies in the field of detection tasks in mammography or tomosynthesis. This 3D breast imaging technique presents, like mammography, numerous challenges in order to understand and to objectively characterize its clinical potential. Studies with model observers specifically validated for detection tasks in medical imaging provide an excellent alternative in terms of time and costs for answering these questions.

[1]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[2]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection in digital mammograms , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observer models. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[9]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Optimal shifted estimates of human-observer templates in two-alternative forced-choice experiments , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Adaptive detection mechanisms in globally statistically nonstationary-oriented noise. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[13]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[14]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  R D Nawfel,et al.  Contrast-detail curves for liver CT. , 1992, Medical physics.

[16]  R G Swensson,et al.  Flattening of the contrast-detail curve for large lesions on liver CT images. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  S Muller,et al.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[22]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[24]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  C Abbey,et al.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. , 1999, Optics express.

[26]  A. Ahumada Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. , 2002, Journal of vision.