Deep learning analysis of breast MRIs for prediction of occult invasive disease in ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE To determine whether deep learning-based algorithms applied to breast MR images can aid in the prediction of occult invasive disease following the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study is retrospective. The data was collected from 2000 to 2014. In this institutional review board-approved study, we analyzed dynamic contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted MRI sequences from 131 patients with a core needle biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of DCIS. We explored two different deep learning approaches to predict whether there was an occult invasive component in the analyzed tumors that was ultimately identified at surgical excision. In the first approach, we adopted the transfer learning strategy. Specifically, we used the pre-trained GoogleNet. In the second approach, we used a pre-trained network to extract deep features, and a support vector machine (SVM) that utilizes these features to predict the upstaging of DCIS. We used nested 10-fold cross validation and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to estimate the performance of the predictive models. RESULTS The best classification performance was obtained using the deep features approach with GoogleNet model pre-trained on ImageNet as the feature extractor and a polynomial kernel SVM used as the classifier (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58-0.79). For the transfer learning based approach, the highest AUC obtained was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77). CONCLUSIONS Convolutional neural networks might be used to identify occult invasive disease in patients diagnosed with DCIS by core needle biopsy.

[1]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  Can algorithmically assessed MRI features predict which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are upstaged to invasive breast cancer? , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Computer-Aided Pulmonary Embolism Detection Using a Novel Vessel-Aligned Multi-planar Image Representation and Convolutional Neural Networks , 2015, MICCAI.

[5]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Guy Amit,et al.  Classification of breast MRI lesions using small-size training sets: comparison of deep learning approaches , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Mohammad Teshnehlab,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis in DCE-MRI using mixture ensemble of convolutional neural networks , 2017, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes , 2017, Medical physics.

[11]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Holistic classification of CT attenuation patterns for interstitial lung diseases via deep convolutional neural networks , 2018, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[12]  L. Strobbe,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  A. Turnbull,et al.  Current treatment trends and the need for better predictive tools in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 2017, Cancer treatment reviews.

[14]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Deep learning-based features of breast MRI for prediction of occult invasive disease following a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: preliminary data , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Lars J. Grimm,et al.  Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[17]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Segmentation label propagation using deep convolutional neural networks and dense conditional random field , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[18]  Ying Lu,et al.  Features of Occult Invasion in Biopsy‐Proven DCIS at Breast MRI , 2013, The breast journal.

[19]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Prediction of occult invasive disease in ductal carcinoma in situ using computer-extracted mammographic features , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  A Neural Probabilistic Language Model , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Lars J. Grimm,et al.  Prediction of Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Using Deep Learning Features. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[22]  Lars J. Grimm,et al.  Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features? , 2017, Academic radiology.

[23]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique , 2016 .

[24]  Dag Pavic,et al.  Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer. , 2015, Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences.

[25]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[27]  Bolei Zhou,et al.  Learning Deep Features for Scene Recognition using Places Database , 2014, NIPS.