“Kracking” the Missing Data Problem: Applying Krackhardt's Cognitive Social Structures to School-Based Social Networks

Social network analysis can enrich school-based research on children's peer relationships. Unfortunately, accurate network analysis requires near-complete data on all students and is underutilized in school-based research because of low rates of parental consent. This article advocates Krackhardt's cognitive social structures (CSS) as a solution to the problem of missing data in social network research. It compares CSS to other common strategies for dealing with missing data and shows how CSS can be used to yield more complete and precise network data. The article also uses an example of a sixth-grade classroom network to demonstrate the application of CSS and potential analyses.

[1]  T. Kindermann Children's development within peer groups: using composite social maps to identify peer networks and to study their influences. , 1998, New directions for child development.

[2]  Alden S. Klovdahl,et al.  Social network research and human subjects protection: Towards more effective infectious disease control , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[3]  Karl E. Bauman,et al.  Adolescent Social Networks , 1996 .

[4]  J. Kiesner,et al.  Peer relations across contexts: individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. , 2003, Child development.

[5]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[6]  David Krackhardt,et al.  When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes. , 1985 .

[7]  R. Cairns,et al.  Social Structure and Social Cognition in Early Adolescence: Affiliative Patterns , 1985 .

[8]  S. Değirmencioğlu,et al.  The structure of adolescent peer networks , 1995 .

[9]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[10]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[11]  D. P. Hartmann,et al.  Friendship Networks of Unpopular, Average, and Popular Children , 1996 .

[12]  R. Cairns,et al.  The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts , 2002 .

[13]  R. Cairns,et al.  Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time , 1994 .

[14]  R B Cairns,et al.  Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. , 1995, Child development.

[15]  A. Ryan,et al.  The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. , 2001, Child development.

[16]  John W. Fertig,et al.  Tables of the Binomial Probability Distribution , 1951 .

[17]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[18]  J.J.H. Bartholomée,et al.  Campell, Donald T. , 2005 .

[19]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[20]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? , 1988 .

[21]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  Consensus analysis of three‐way social network data , 1997 .

[23]  K. Bauman,et al.  The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  William Richards,et al.  Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies , 1992 .

[25]  R. Cairns,et al.  Aggressive Behaviors in Social Interaction and Developmental Adaptation: A Narrative Analysis of Interpersonal Conflicts During Early Adolescence , 2002 .

[26]  C. David,et al.  Do Positive Self-Perceptions Have a “Dark Side”? Examination of the Link between Perceptual Bias and Aggression , 2000, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[27]  J. Coie,et al.  A comparison of aggressive-rejected and nonaggressive-rejected children's interpretations of self-directed and other-directed rejection. , 1996, Child development.

[28]  Daniele Bondonio,et al.  Predictors of accuracy in perceiving informal social networks , 1998 .

[29]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  Structural Effects on Children's Friendships and Cliques. , 1979 .

[30]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[31]  W. Shrum Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .

[32]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[33]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[34]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy , 1986 .

[35]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Network inference, error, and informant (in)accuracy: a Bayesian approach , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[37]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  Social Structure during the School Years: Onset of the Degrouping Process. , 1987 .

[38]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[39]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Seeing things clearly: social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception , 1998 .

[40]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[41]  T. Farmer,et al.  Different Forms of Aggression among Inner-City African-American Children: Gender, Configurations, and School Social Networks. , 2003 .

[42]  K. Bauman,et al.  Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. , 1993, Journal of health and social behavior.

[43]  C. Patterson,et al.  Children's perceptions of self and of relationships with others as a function of sociometric status. , 1990, Child development.

[44]  E. Woody,et al.  Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children: variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains. , 1993, Child development.