Standard atomic volumes in double-stranded DNA and packing in protein--DNA interfaces.

Standard volumes for atoms in double-stranded B-DNA are derived using high resolution crystal structures from the Nucleic Acid Database (NDB) and compared with corresponding values derived from crystal structures of small organic compounds in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). Two different methods are used to compute these volumes: the classical Voronoi method, which does not depend on the size of atoms, and the related Radical Planes method which does. Results show that atomic groups buried in the interior of double-stranded DNA are, on average, more tightly packed than in related small molecules in the CSD. The packing efficiency of DNA atoms at the interfaces of 25 high resolution protein-DNA complexes is determined by computing the ratios between the volumes of interfacial DNA atoms and the corresponding standard volumes. These ratios are found to be close to unity, indicating that the DNA atoms at protein-DNA interfaces are as closely packed as in crystals of B-DNA. Analogous volume ratios, computed for buried protein atoms, are also near unity, confirming our earlier conclusions that the packing efficiency of these atoms is similar to that in the protein interior. In addition, we examine the number, volume and solvent occupation of cavities located at the protein-DNA interfaces and compared them with those in the protein interior. Cavities are found to be ubiquitous in the interfaces as well as inside the protein moieties. The frequency of solvent occupation of cavities is however higher in the interfaces, indicating that those are more hydrated than protein interiors. Lastly, we compare our results with those obtained using two different measures of shape complementarity of the analysed interfaces, and find that the correlation between our volume ratios and these measures, as well as between the measures themselves, is weak. Our results indicate that a tightly packed environment made up of DNA, protein and solvent atoms plays a significant role in protein-DNA recognition.

[1]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  Detection of cavities in a set of interpenetrating spheres , 1991 .

[2]  C. Chothia,et al.  Principles of protein–protein recognition , 1975, Nature.

[3]  J L Finney,et al.  Volume occupation, environment and accessibility in proteins. The problem of the protein surface. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Solid model compounds and the thermodynamics of protein unfolding. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  The nucleic acid database. A comprehensive relational database of three-dimensional structures of nucleic acids. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[6]  M. L. Connolly.  Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[7]  F. Richards.  The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J L Finney,et al.  Calculation of protein volumes: an alternative to the Voronoi procedure. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Georges Voronoi.  Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Deuxième mémoire. Recherches sur les parallélloèdres primitifs. , 1908 .

[10]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  R. Laskowski.  SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[12]  F M Richards,et al.  Protein packing: dependence on protein size, secondary structure and amino acid composition. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Janin,et al.  Wet and dry interfaces: the role of solvent in protein-protein and protein-DNA recognition. , 1999, Structure.

[14]  F. Allen,et al.  The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: computer-based search, retrieval, analysis and display of information , 1979 .

[15]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  Evidence for a molten globule state as a general intermediate in protein folding , 1990, FEBS letters.

[16]  A. Bondi.  van der Waals Volumes and Radii , 1964 .

[17]  David A. Fletcher,et al.  The United Kingdom Chemical Database Service , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  F. Richards.  Protein stability: still an unsolved problem , 1997, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[19]  B. Matthews,et al.  Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. , 1992, Science.

[20]  Zukang Feng,et al.  The Nucleic Acid Database. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[21]  M Gerstein,et al.  Volume changes on protein folding. , 1994, Structure.

[22]  S. Wodak,et al.  Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  M L Connolly,et al.  Atomic size packing defects in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[24]  R Nussinov,et al.  A set of van der Waals and coulombic radii of protein atoms for molecular and solvent‐accessible surface calculation, packing evaluation, and docking , 1998, Proteins.

[25]  Georges Voronoi.  Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Premier mémoire. Sur quelques propriétés des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. , 1908 .

[26]  C. Chothia,et al.  The Packing Density in Proteins: Standard Radii and Volumes , 1999 .

[27]  M Gerstein,et al.  Packing at the protein-water interface. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[29]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Probing the stability of a partly folded apomyoglobin intermediate by site-directed mutagenesis. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[30]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.

[32]  K Nadassy,et al.  Structural features of protein-nucleic acid recognition sites. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[33]  H M Berman,et al.  Protein-DNA interactions: A structural analysis. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  M. Levitt,et al.  The volume of atoms on the protein surface: calculated from simulation, using Voronoi polyhedra. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.