Dual-Purpose Water Buffalo Production Systems in Tropical Latin America: Bases for a Sustainable Model

Simple Summary Buffaloes in the Latin American tropics have gained relevance in recent years thanks to the rusticity and productivity of this species and the potential of these ecosystems. Through a specialized literature review, the options were explored to promote efficient, profitable and sustainable dual-purpose production systems, which implied taking into consideration the characteristics of a fragile environment such as the tropics but with abundant forage resources. Buffaloes have distinctive characteristics with respect to cattle, such as a high fat milk content, ability to produce healthy and heavy calves from dairy cows and their need for thermoregulation, which implies the availability of water ponds and shade in grazing areas. Therefore, we propose the basis for designing intensive rotational grazing models and, under certain silvopastoral conditions, taking advantage of the gregarious behavior of buffaloes. These models require integral forms of management, including the organization and participation of producers in commercial channels, in order to value meat, milk and dairy products, given that their nutritional qualities allow them to be sold as differentiated products. There have been successful experiences in the region with this dual-purpose model, which, with the necessary adaptations, can be strengthened with buffaloes. Abstract Tropical regions of Latin America have been incorporated into development in recent decades, with extensive cattle ranching as one of the main economic activities but without adequate planning, drastically degrading the ecosystem. In recent years, buffalo production has been incorporated into the region, with possibilities for development in profitable and sustainable models. To study this option in depth, a broad bibliographic review was carried out focusing on the ecological characteristics of tropical zones and the physiological and productive characteristics of buffaloes. We also investigated the structure and functioning of dual-purpose systems that have worked in cattle and that can be optimized with this alternative animal species. The possibility of taking sustainable advantage of abundant forage resources in the region was detected through intensive grazing models, as well as agrosilvopastoral systems, due to the gregarious qualities of buffaloes and responding to their thermoregulation needs. In this way, the productive and regenerative capacities of the dual-purpose system could be increased, as well as the quality of meat and milk, which could be marketed as differentiated products, taking advantage of their outstanding nutritional qualities. Integral management of the dual-purpose system is proposed, retaking the bases of the original model of family characters, diversified and with low investments and risks, which with specific innovations can be an effective development option for producers in the region.

[1]  A. D. de Almeida,et al.  Water buffalo production in the Brazilian Amazon Basin: a review , 2021, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[2]  S. R. Mishra Thermoregulatory responses in riverine buffaloes against heat stress: An updated review. , 2021, Journal of thermal biology.

[3]  A. Alarcon‐Rojo,et al.  Dark cutting in large ruminants: Effect of management and environmental factors , 2021 .

[4]  F. Napolitano,et al.  Thermal biology in river buffalo in the humid tropics: neurophysiological and behavioral responses assessed by infrared thermography , 2021 .

[5]  D. Vecchio,et al.  Bubalus bubalis: A Short Story , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[6]  V. Rodríguez-Estévez,et al.  Selectivity of Leguminous Trees by Water Buffaloes in Semi-intensive Systems , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[7]  S. Bagella,et al.  Patchy landscapes support more plant diversity and ecosystem services than wood grasslands in Mediterranean silvopastoral agroforestry systems , 2020 .

[8]  F. Napolitano,et al.  River buffalo meat production and quality: sustainability, productivity, nutritional and sensory properties , 2020, Journal of Buffalo Science.

[9]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  cientific Findings on the Quality of River Buffalo Meat and Prospects for Future Studies , 2020 .

[10]  M. Hassler,et al.  Capturing the value of ecosystem services from silvopastoral systems: Perceptions from selected Italian farms , 2020 .

[11]  V. Rodríguez-Estévez,et al.  Effect of Silvopastoral Systems in the Thermoregulatory and Feeding Behaviors of Water Buffaloes Under Different Conditions of Heat Stress , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[12]  F. Napolitano,et al.  Similarities and Differences between River Buffaloes and Cattle: Health, Physiological, Behavioral and Productivity Aspects , 2020, Journal of Buffalo Science.

[13]  D. Mota-Rojas,et al.  Scientific findings related to changes in vascular microcirculation using infrared thermography in the river buffalo , 2020 .

[14]  Laura Yolina Mesa Forero,et al.  Caracterización de la gestión de la información del sector ovino-caprino del Chicamocha Medio , 2020 .

[15]  T. R. Moreira,et al.  Factors associated with the prevalence of antibodies against Brucella abortus in water buffaloes from Santarém, Lower Amazon region, Brazil. , 2020, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[16]  M. Hernández-Chávez,et al.  Pastoreo racional intensivo como alternativa para una ganadería baja en emisiones , 2019 .

[17]  R. Schulte,et al.  Ecological intensification by integrating biogas production into nutrient cycling: Modeling the case of Agroecological Symbiosis , 2019, Agricultural Systems.

[18]  Lorenzo Danilo Granados-Rivera,et al.  Caracterización y tipificación del sistema doble propósito en la ganadería bovina del Distrito de Desarrollo Rural 151, Tabasco, México , 2019, Acta Universitaria.

[19]  F. Napolitano,et al.  Dairy buffalo behaviour and welfare from calving to milking. , 2019, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources.

[20]  Amaro,et al.  Intensive rational grazing as alternative for low-emission animal husbandry , 2019 .

[21]  D. Vázquez-Luna BÚFALO DE AGUA (Bubalus bubalis): UN ACERCAMIENTO AL MANEJO SUSTENTABLE EN EL SUR DE VERACRUZ, MÉXICO , 2018, Agro Productividad.

[22]  N. Couix,et al.  Designing agroecological farming systems with farmers: A review , 2018, Agricultural Systems.

[23]  V. Cuevas-Reyes,et al.  Caracterización del sistema bovino doble propósito en el noroeste de México: productores, recursos y problemática , 2018 .

[24]  Mildrey Soca-Pérez,et al.  Los sistemas silvopastoriles como alternativa para la producción animal sostenible en el contexto actual de la ganadería tropical , 2017 .

[25]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Food production, ecosystem services and biodiversity: We can't have it all everywhere. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  E. M. Patiño,et al.  Pasado, presente y futuro del búfalo en Argentina , 2016 .

[27]  Jason Karpman,et al.  Global change effects on humid tropical forests: Evidence for biogeochemical and biodiversity shifts at an ecosystem scale , 2016 .

[28]  David W. Archer,et al.  Exploring agricultural production systems and their fundamental components with system dynamics modelling , 2016 .

[29]  J. Vilaboa-Arroniz,et al.  TIPIFICACIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE DOBLE PROPÓSITO PARA PRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE EN EL DISTRITO DE DESARROLLO RURAL 008, VERACRUZ, MÉXICO Classification of dual purpose systems for milk production in the rural development district 008, Veracruz, Mexico , 2015 .

[30]  C. Arriaga-Jordán,et al.  Socioeconomic and productive characterization of dual-purpose farms oriented to milk production in a subtropical region of Mexico , 2015, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[31]  I. Rao,et al.  Tropical forage-based systems for climate-smart livestock production in Latin America , 2014 .

[32]  M. Tichit,et al.  Agroecological principles for the redesign of integrated crop–livestock systems , 2014 .

[33]  M. Belda,et al.  Climate classification revisited: from Köppen to Trewartha , 2014 .

[34]  J. Solano,et al.  El uso eficiente de los forrajes tropicales en la alimentación de los bovinos , 2014 .

[35]  A. Beatriz,et al.  Ganadería bovina de carne y leche. Problemática y alternativas , 2014 .

[36]  P. N. Nelson,et al.  Hydrology of a forested riparian zone in an agricultural landscape of the humid tropics , 2013 .

[37]  Fernando Cervantes Escoto,et al.  Factores que determinan el uso de innovaciones tecnológicas en la ganadería de doble propósito en Sinaloa, Mexico , 2013 .

[38]  J. M. González,et al.  Adopción de tecnologías por productores beneficiarios del programa de estímulos a la productividad ganadera (PROGAN) en México , 2013 .

[39]  A. Minervino,et al.  Buffalo under Threat in Amazon Valley, Brazil , 2013 .

[40]  Gerardo Barboza Jiménez,et al.  Bondades ecológicas del búfalo de agua: camino hacia la certificación , 2015 .

[41]  Exequiel Maria-Patiño Producción y calidad de la leche bubalina , 2011 .

[42]  A. Borroto,et al.  Conducta de búfalos en pastoreo en humedales de Ciego de Ávila, Cuba , 2011 .

[43]  I. Marai,et al.  Buffalo's biological functions as affected by heat stress - A review , 2010 .

[44]  P. Ramírez-Moreno,et al.  Caracterización de ganaderos y unidades de producción pecuaria beneficiarios del programa de estímulos a la productividad ganadera (PROGAN) en México , 2008 .

[45]  Joaquín Sosa-Ramírez,et al.  Competitividad en la cadena productiva de leche del estado de Aguascalientes, México , 2007 .