Organizing for Economic Empowerment of Battered Women

Abstract When describing reasons for remaining with or returning to an abusive partner, many women mention economic dependence on their abuser. Few battered women, especially those who are poor, have the economic resources necessary to live independently. Additionally, battered women are commonly isolated from financial resources lacking ready access to cash, checking accounts, or charge accounts. Creating strategies that address financial well-being is essential to addressing the issue of domestic violence. This article discusses collaboration among domestic violence service providers in the St. Louis, Missouri region created to promote the economic development of low-income battered women. The collaboration has culminated in formalized economic service provisions including economic education and credit counseling; women's matched savings accounts; and economic advocacy and support services.

[1]  M. MacNamara.  The Family in Stress: Social Work Before and After Renal Homotransplantation , 1969 .

[2]  Roger A. Petersen.  Social Class, Social Learning, and Wife Abuse , 1980, Social Service Review.

[3]  M. Straus,et al.  Wife's Marital Dependency and Wife Abuse. , 1982 .

[4]  M. Strube,et al.  The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment. , 1983 .

[5]  M. Strube,et al.  Factors Related to the Decision to Leave an Abusive Relationship. , 1984 .

[6]  A Model State Act: Remedies for Domestic Abuse , 1984 .

[7]  B. Gray.  Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration , 1985 .

[8]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Organizational Collaboration. , 1986 .

[9]  J. Malouff,et al.  The relationship between characteristics of the victim, persuasive techniques of the batterer, and returning to a battering relationship. , 1988, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  E. Gondolf.  Battered women as survivors , 1988 .

[11]  M. Bloom,et al.  Inter-agency collaboration: some working principles. , 1991 .

[12]  M. Sherraden,et al.  Assets and the Poor: New American Welfare Policy , 1990 .

[13]  Cris M. Sullivan,et al.  The Provision of Advocacy Services to Women Leaving Abusive Partners , 1991 .

[14]  A. Witte,et al.  Domestic Violence: A Nonrandom Affair , 1991 .

[15]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[16]  D. Hamilton.  Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy , 1992 .

[17]  Michael A. Stegman,et al.  The Impact of Home Ownership on the Social and Political Involvement of Low-Income People , 1994 .

[18]  Cris M. Sullivan,et al.  An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Six-month follow-up , 1994, American journal of community psychology.

[19]  William M. Rohe,et al.  The Effects of Homeownership: On the Self-Esteem, Perceived Control and Life Satisfaction of Low-Income People , 1994 .

[20]  Richard K. Green,et al.  Measuring the Benefits of Homeowning: Effects on Children Redux , 1997 .

[21]  Community-Based Consortia: , 1995 .

[22]  Peter H. Rossi,et al.  The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys , 1996 .

[23]  M. Weil.  Community Building: Building Community Practice , 1996 .

[24]  Darlyne Bailey,et al.  Interorganizational Community-Based Collaboratives: A Strategic Response to Shape the Social Work Agenda , 1996 .

[25]  William M. Rohe,et al.  Homeownership and neighborhood stability , 1996 .

[26]  K. Stronks,et al.  The interrelationship between income, health and employment status. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  A. Farmer,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Domestic Violence , 1997 .

[28]  C. Rocha.  Factors That Contribute to Economic Well-Being in Female-Headed Households , 1997 .

[29]  On the Difficulty of Eradicating Masculine Violence: Multisystem Overdetermination , 1998 .

[30]  Edward Scanion Msw.  Low-Income Homeownership Policy as a Community Development Strategy , 1998 .

[31]  E. Hanushek.  What money can't buy: Family income and children's life chances , 1998 .

[32]  J. Edleson,et al.  Forced Bonding or Community Collaboration? Partnerships between science and practice in research on woman battering , 1998 .

[33]  Low-Income Homeownership Policy as a Community Development Strategy , 1998 .

[34]  D. Kurz.  Women, Welfare, and Domestic Violence , 1998 .

[35]  J. Graham,et al.  Collaboration: A Social Work Practice Method , 1999 .

[36]  Juanita M. Firestone,et al.  Economic Context and Multiple Abuse Techniques , 2000 .

[37]  E. Lyon,et al.  Welfare, Poverty, and Abused Women: New Research and its Implications , 2001 .

[38]  Joanna M. Badagliacco,et al.  Trapped By Poverty / Trapped By Abuse Proposal for Single Paper Submission , 2001 .

[39]  T. Mizrahi,et al.  Complexities of coalition building: leaders' successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions. , 2001, Social work.

[40]  Sondra G. Beverly,et al.  Savings and Asset Accumulation in Individual Development Accounts , 2001 .

[41]  Mark Schreiner,et al.  Financial Education and Savings Outcomes in Individual Development Accounts , 2001 .

[42]  Cris M. Sullivan,et al.  The Process Through Which an Advocacy Intervention Resulted in Positive Change for Battered Women Over Time , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[43]  Michael Sherraden,et al.  Innovation in social policy: collaborative policy advocacy. , 2002, Social work.

[44]  Driving Out of Poverty in Private Automobiles , 2003 .

[45]  A. Farmer,et al.  Explaining the Recent Decline in Domestic Violence , 2003 .

[46]  F. Ssewamala,et al.  Saving in Low-Income Households: Evidence From Interviews With Participants in the American Dream Demonstration , 2005 .

[47]  J. Edleson,et al.  Advocacy for battered women: A national survey , 1994, Journal of Family Violence.

[48]  T. Miller,et al.  O F Jus Tice Pr O G Ra Ms Bja N National Institute of Justice Victim Costs and Consequences: a New Look Victim Costs and Consequences: a New Look Introduction , 2022 .