Decision making for best cogeneration power integration into a grid

Cogeneration systems are known to be efficient power systems for their ability to reduce pollution. Their integration into a grid requires simultaneous consideration of the economic and environmental challenges. Thus, an optimal cogeneration power are adopted to face such challenges.This work presents a novelty in selectinga suitable solution using heuristic optimization method. Its aim is to optimize the cogeneration capacity to be installed according to the economic and environmental concerns. This novelty is based on the sensitivity and data analysis method, namely, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). This later establishes a compromise between power, economy, and pollution, which leads to find asuitable cogeneration power, and further, to be integrated into a grid. The data exploited were the results of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) multi-objective optimization. Moreover, the impact of the utility’s subsidy on the selected power is shown.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[2]  Maxime Wack,et al.  Best Suitable Cogeneration Power for Factories from Multi-Objective Data Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  H. Sugihara,et al.  A cooperation with customer-side cogeneration systems for power flow congestion relief and its environmental impact , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[4]  Evaristo Chalbaud Biscaia,et al.  Genetic algorithm development for multi-objective optimization of batch free-radical polymerization reactors , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Lingfeng Wang,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for decision-making of energy and comfort management in building automation and control , 2012 .

[7]  Rahula A. Attalage,et al.  A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems , 2013 .

[8]  Ming-Tong Tsay,et al.  Applying the multi-objective approach for operation strategy of cogeneration systems under environmental constraints , 2003 .

[9]  Fabio Freschi,et al.  Economic and environmental analysis of a trigeneration system for food-industry: A case study , 2013 .

[10]  S. Azarm,et al.  Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept , 2005 .

[11]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the Internet , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Introduction to a modeling of social decision processes , 1983 .

[14]  Rainer Dudek,et al.  Multi-objective decision support system in numerical reliability optimization of modern electronic packaging , 2009 .

[15]  Salah Laghrouche,et al.  Cogeneration systems for industrial sector: An optimal power , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA).

[16]  Ming-Tong Tsay,et al.  Interactive best-compromise approach for operation dispatch of cogeneration systems , 2001 .

[17]  T. Saaty,et al.  Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1998 .

[18]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  A new macroeconomic forecasting and policy evaluation method using the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[19]  Christos A. Frangopoulos,et al.  Effect of reliability considerations on the optimal synthesis, design and operation of a cogeneration system , 2004 .

[20]  Piyuan Lin,et al.  Broiler Growth Performance Analysis: From Correlation Analysis, Multiple Linear Regression, to Neural Network , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization and decision making procedure , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[23]  Maxime Wack,et al.  Contribution to the Models of Performance of Cogeneration Systems Integration , 2015 .

[24]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Interactive multiobjective optimization with NIMBUS for decision making under uncertainty , 2014, OR Spectr..

[25]  Ming-Tong Tsay,et al.  Operation strategy of cogeneration systems under environmental constraints , 2000, PowerCon 2000. 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX409).

[26]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Group Decision Making and its Optimization With an Allocation of Information Granularity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[27]  T. Saaty,et al.  Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process , 2003 .

[28]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to handle dependence with the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[30]  Taher Niknam,et al.  Improved particle swarm optimisation for multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, loss, emission and voltage stability index , 2012 .

[31]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[32]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Fuzzy multi-objective optimization decision-making of reliability of series system , 1997 .

[33]  David W. Coit,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  José L. Bernal-Agustín,et al.  Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage , 2011 .