Universality of fixation probabilities in randomly structured populations

The stage of evolution is the population of reproducing individuals. The structure of the population is known to affect the dynamics and outcome of evolutionary processes, but analytical results for generic random structures have been lacking. The most general result so far, the isothermal theorem, assumes the propensity for change in each position is exactly the same, but realistic biological structures are always subject to variation and noise. We consider a finite population under constant selection whose structure is given by a variety of weighted, directed, random graphs; vertices represent individuals and edges interactions between individuals. By establishing a robustness result for the isothermal theorem and using large deviation estimates to understand the typical structure of random graphs, we prove that for a generalization of the Erdős-Rényi model, the fixation probability of an invading mutant is approximately the same as that of a mutant of equal fitness in a well-mixed population with high probability. Simulations of perturbed lattices, small-world networks, and scale-free networks behave similarly. We conjecture that the fixation probability in a well-mixed population, (1 − r−1)/(1 − r−n), is universal: for many random graph models, the fixation probability approaches the above function uniformly as the graphs become large.

[1]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[2]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[3]  M. Perc Coherence resonance in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2006 .

[4]  Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou,et al.  Approximating evolutionary dynamics on networks using a Neighbourhood Configuration model. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[6]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Strategy selection in structured populations. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  P. Deift Universality for mathematical and physical systems , 2006, math-ph/0603038.

[8]  D. Stroock,et al.  Probability Theory: An Analytic View , 1995, The Mathematical Gazette.

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[10]  M. Whitlock Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. , 2003, Genetics.

[11]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VISCOSITY DOES NOT AFFECT THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION DURING EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION OF COLICIGENIC BACTERIA , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  P. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  On the fixation probability of superstars , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The probability of fixation of a favoured allele in a subdivided population , 1993 .

[15]  Mayuko Nakamaru,et al.  Spread of two linked social norms on complex interaction networks. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Multiple strategies in structured populations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[18]  M. Perc,et al.  Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Feng Fu,et al.  Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner's dilemma vs. snowdrift games. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  A. Borodin,et al.  Macdonald processes , 2011, Probability Theory and Related Fields.

[22]  L. Wahl,et al.  The fixation probability of beneficial mutations , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: A User's Guide to Ecological Applications , 1994 .

[24]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Broom,et al.  Game-Theoretical Models in Biology , 2013 .

[26]  Karin Johst,et al.  Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  S Redner,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on degree-heterogeneous graphs. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[28]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[29]  Yu-Ting Chen,et al.  Sharp benefit-to-cost rules for the evolution of cooperation on regular graphs , 2011, 1107.1513.

[30]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Spatial dilemmas of diffusible public goods , 2013, eLife.

[31]  Christoph Hauert,et al.  Fixation probabilities on superstars, revisited and revised. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  The effect of population structure on the rate of evolution , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Diversification along environmental gradients in spatially structured populations , 2009 .

[34]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[35]  S. Levin Population Dynamic Models in Heterogeneous Environments , 1976 .

[36]  Robert M. May,et al.  Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics , 1994, Nature.

[37]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[38]  M. Broom,et al.  An analysis of the fixation probability of a mutant on special classes of non-directed graphs , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  T. Maruyama,et al.  A simple proof that certain quantities are independent of the geographical structure of population. , 1974, Theoretical population biology.

[40]  N. Bingham Probability Theory: An Analytic View , 2002 .

[41]  T. Maruyama,et al.  A Markov process of gene frequency change in a geographically structured population. , 1974, Genetics.

[42]  M. Nowak,et al.  The linear process of somatic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  A. W. F. Edwards,et al.  The statistical processes of evolutionary theory , 1963 .

[44]  V. Barbosa,et al.  Early appraisal of the fixation probability in directed networks. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[46]  Mark Broom,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on small-order graphs , 2009 .

[47]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[48]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[49]  M. Weigt,et al.  On the properties of small-world network models , 1999, cond-mat/9903411.

[50]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[51]  H. Yau,et al.  Universality of local spectral statistics of random matrices , 2011, 1106.4986.