Haptic Object Individuation

Item individuation, i.e., how we decide which parts belong to one object and which to another, is an important aspect of haptic perception and may be important for design of interfaces in which different buttons have to be distinguished. We daily hold several objects in our hand. Somehow, we decide that we are holding several small objects instead of one large object. We aim to provide insight into how it is decided that some parts belong to the same object and others to a different object, i.e., object individuation. This process may be influenced by heterogeneity of size or shape of the handled objects. To investigate this, subjects were asked to grasp varying numbers of shapes together in the hand and respond fast and accurately the number of shapes. We compared performance for a set of homogeneous objects (Experiment 1) to performance for sets of objects heterogeneous in size (Experiment 2) or shape (Experiment 3). It was found that numerosity judgments in terms of response times, error rates, and object handling were similar in all three experiments. We conclude that size and shape features that are used for object recognition do not play a role in item individuation.

[1]  Myrthe A. Plaisier,et al.  Haptic Search for Spheres and Cubes , 2008, EuroHaptics.

[2]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[6]  Stanley Coren,et al.  The Left-Hander Syndrome: The Causes and Consequences of Left-Handedness , 1992 .

[7]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Lana M Trick,et al.  More than superstition: Differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A. Kappers,et al.  Haptic pop-out in a hand sweep. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[13]  F. Campbell,et al.  The Magic Number 4 ± 0: A New Look at Visual Numerosity Judgements , 1976, Perception.

[14]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic identification of common objects: Effects of constraining the manual exploration process , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  W. M. Bergmann Tiest,et al.  Salient features in three-dimensional haptic shape perception , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew Simpson,et al.  Subitizing in Tactile Perception , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[19]  Myrthe A. Plaisier,et al.  Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Myrthe A. Plaisier,et al.  The role of item fixation in haptic search , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[22]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Using segmented linear regression models with unknown change points to analyze strategy shifts in cognitive tasks , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.