Prime proportion affects masked priming of fixed and free-choice responses.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Brian W. Haas,et al. Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] R. Verleger,et al. How the Self Controls Its Automatic Pilot when Processing Subliminal Information , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[3] S. T. Klapp,et al. Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.
[5] M. Masson,et al. Prime Validity Affects Masked Repetition Priming: Evidence for an Episodic Resource Account of Priming , 2001 .
[6] K. Forster,et al. Unconscious cognition isn’t that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task , 2008, Cognition.
[7] Martin Eimer,et al. Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] Glen E Bodner,et al. Repetition proportion affects masked priming in nonspeeded tasks , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[9] Glen E Bodner,et al. Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[10] S. Dehaene,et al. Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.
[11] A. Kiesel,et al. Negative congruency effects: A test of the inhibition account , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.
[12] M. Damian,et al. Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] Bernie Caessens,et al. Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] S. T. Klapp,et al. The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[15] Stuart T Klapp,et al. Either or neither, but not both: locating the effects of masked primes , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[16] Glen E Bodner,et al. Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[17] S. Klapp,et al. The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection , 2002 .
[18] M Eimer,et al. A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[19] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] J. Hoffmann,et al. Mechanisms of subliminal response priming , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[21] J. Hoffmann,et al. Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.