Out there and in here: design for blended scientific inquiry learning

One of the benefits of mobile technologies is to combine ‘the digital’ (e.g., data, information, photos) with ‘field’ experiences in novel ways that are contextualized by people’s current located activities. However, often cost, mobility disabilities and time exclude students from engaging in such peripatetic experiences. The Out There and In Here project, is exploring a combination of mobile and tabletop technologies in support for collaborative learning. A system is being developed for synchronous collaboration between geology students in the field and peers at an indoor location. The overarching goal of this research is to develop technologies that support people working together in a suitable manner for their locations. There are two OTIH project research threads. The first deals with disabled learner access issues: these complex issues are being reviewed in subsequent evaluations and publications. This paper will deal with issues of technology supported learning design for remote and co-located science learners. Several stakeholder evaluations and two field trials have reviewed two research questions: 1. What will enhance the learning experience for those in the field and laboratory? 2. How can learning trajectories and appropriate technologies be designed to support equitable co-located and remote learning collaboration? This paper focuses on describing the iterative linked development of technologies and scientific inquiry pedagogy. Two stages within the research project are presented. The 1st stage details several pilot studies over 3 years with 21 student participants in synchronous collaborations with traditional technology and pedagogical models. Findings revealed that this was an engaging and useful experience although issues of equity in collaboration needed further research. The 2nd stage, in this project, has been to evaluate data from over 25 stakeholders (academics, learning and technology designers) to develop pervasive ambient technological solutions supporting orchestration of mixed levels of pedagogy (i.e. abstract synthesis to specific investigation). Middleware between tabletop ‘surface’ technologies and mobile devices are being designed with Microsoft and OOKL (a mobile software company) to support these developments. Initial findings reveal issues around equity, ownership and professional identity.

[1]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The Role of Mobile Devices in Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry in situ , 2008, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[2]  Ian Taylor,et al.  Three dimensional visualization of the World Wide Web , 1999, CSUR.

[3]  Michael Young,et al.  From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction , 2003 .

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Entry and access : how shareability comes about , 2007 .

[5]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[8]  Russell Beale,et al.  Nature-Inspired Visualisation of Similarity and Relationships in Human Systems and Behaviours , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[9]  Joe T. Elkins,et al.  Teaching Geology in the Field: Significant Geoscience Concept Gains in Entirely Field-based Introductory Geology Courses , 2007 .

[10]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Understanding the benefit and costs of communities of practice , 2002, CACM.

[11]  Ann Jones,et al.  Supporting location-based inquiry learning across school, field and home contexts , 2008 .

[12]  L. Shulman,et al.  Teaching as Community Property: Essays on Higher Education , 2004 .

[13]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[14]  Steve Benford,et al.  Orchestrating a mixed reality performance , 2001, CHI.

[15]  J. Libarkin,et al.  Research in Science Education: The Expert-Novice Continuum , 2007 .

[16]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Peter Lonsdale,et al.  A context awareness architecture for facilitating mobile learning , 2003 .

[18]  Debbie Mojta.  Building a community of practice at the help desk , 2002, SIGUCCS '02.

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[20]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Around the Table: Studies in Co-located Collaboration , 2006 .

[21]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Social empowerment and exclusion: A case study on digital libraries , 2005, TCHI.

[22]  V. Robinson.  Teaching in the community. , 1990, Nursing times.

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[24]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  How Mobile Technologies Are Changing the Way Children Learn , 2009 .

[25]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Extending tabletops to support flexible collaborative interactions , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[26]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[27]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[28]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[29]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Mixed Reality Environments: Designing Novel Learning Activities for Young Children , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.