An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Cindy M. Bukach,et al. Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[2] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Font Tuning Associated with Expertise in Letter Perception , 2006, Perception.
[3] Zhe Wang,et al. Activation of Face Expertise and the Inversion Effect , 2006, Psychological science.
[4] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[5] Isabel Gauthier,et al. An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[6] Yaoda Xu. Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[7] M. Sigman,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .
[8] B. Duchaine,et al. Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .
[9] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.
[10] Joseph T Devlin,et al. The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area” , 2004, NeuroImage.
[11] Guinevere F. Eden,et al. Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.
[12] Jean-Luc Velay,et al. Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing , 2003, NeuroImage.
[13] Joseph T Devlin,et al. The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.
[14] S. Dehaene,et al. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[15] Talma Hendler,et al. Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.
[16] M. Tarr,et al. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] M. Farah,et al. Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] J. Tanaka. The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[19] M. Tarr,et al. The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] S Lehéricy,et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[21] H. D. Gage,et al. Cortical Activity Related to Accuracy of Letter Recognition , 2000, NeuroImage.
[22] Isabel Gauthier,et al. What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[24] R. Salmelin,et al. Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[25] M. Tarr,et al. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] J. Pernier,et al. ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[27] M. Tarr,et al. Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.
[28] Philippe G Schyns,et al. Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.
[29] Glyn W Humphreys,et al. AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[30] T A Polk,et al. The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] J. Tanaka,et al. Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[32] M. Tarr,et al. Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.
[33] D. Bub,et al. The Neural Substrate for Concrete, Abstract, and Emotional Word Lexica A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[35] Emmanuel Dupoux,et al. Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] M. Tarr,et al. Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.
[37] T. Allison,et al. Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[38] L. Katz,et al. Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[39] N. F. Johnson,et al. A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.
[40] S. Carey,et al. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .
[41] T. Allison,et al. Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.
[42] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[43] Karl J. Friston,et al. The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[44] T. Sanocki. Effects of font- and letter-specific experience on the perceptual processing of letters , 1992 .
[45] J. Tanaka,et al. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] S. Petersen,et al. Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. , 1990, Science.
[47] J. Langlois,et al. Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .
[48] P. Bigsby. The visual processor module and normal adult readers. , 1988, British journal of psychology.
[49] T. Sanocki. Perception : Font-Specific , Schematic Tuning , 2011 .
[50] A. Young,et al. Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.
[51] D. Medin,et al. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.
[52] Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al. Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[53] M Coltheart,et al. Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.
[54] G. Humphreys,et al. The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .
[55] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[56] G C Oden,et al. A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[57] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[58] S. Jay Samuels,et al. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .
[59] J. Jonides,et al. A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .
[60] Stephen J. Boies,et al. Components of attention. , 1971 .
[61] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[62] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[63] M I Posner,et al. Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.
[64] Ying Liu,et al. The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[65] G. Cottrell,et al. Seeing Blobs as Faces or Letters: Modeling Effects on Discrimination , 2004 .
[66] J. Mullennix,et al. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[67] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .
[68] T. Sanocki,et al. Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[69] M. Coltheart. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. , 1981 .
[70] M. Posner. Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .
[71] J. L. Mcclelland. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[72] M. Posner,et al. Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.