An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework

While there has been increasing effort in dissociating the neural substrates recruited by perception of different objects, the theoretical and behavioural work needed to understand such dissociation lags behind. In an attempt to compare expertise in letter and face perception, we outline a theoretical framework that characterizes different types of object expertise based on the task demand (level of abstraction) required in object categorization. Face perception requires categorization at a subordinate level, whereas letter perception involves mainly basic-level categorization. Accordingly face and letter perception should represent two different types of expertise and display different neural and behavioural markers. Results from three behavioural experiments supported the predictions of the framework in that letter expertise is characterized by an enhancement of the basic-level advantage, instead of its attenuation as typically found for face perception. We compare this framework with Farah's taxonomy of visual abilities based on cooccurrence of deficits in visual agnosias.

[1]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Font Tuning Associated with Expertise in Letter Perception , 2006, Perception.

[3]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Activation of Face Expertise and the Inversion Effect , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Yaoda Xu Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[8]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .

[9]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area” , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Jean-Luc Velay,et al.  Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  H. D. Gage,et al.  Cortical Activity Related to Accuracy of Letter Recognition , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[29]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  T A Polk,et al.  The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[33]  D. Bub,et al.  The Neural Substrate for Concrete, Abstract, and Emotional Word Lexica A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[37]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  N. F. Johnson,et al.  A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[41]  T. Allison,et al.  Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  T. Sanocki Effects of font- and letter-specific experience on the perceptual processing of letters , 1992 .

[45]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  S. Petersen,et al.  Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. , 1990, Science.

[47]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[48]  P. Bigsby The visual processor module and normal adult readers. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[49]  T. Sanocki Perception : Font-Specific , Schematic Tuning , 2011 .

[50]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[51]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[52]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  M Coltheart,et al.  Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[54]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .

[55]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[56]  G C Oden,et al.  A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[59]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .

[60]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[61]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[63]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[64]  Ying Liu,et al.  The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[65]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Seeing Blobs as Faces or Letters: Modeling Effects on Discrimination , 2004 .

[66]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[68]  T. Sanocki,et al.  Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  M. Coltheart Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. , 1981 .

[70]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[71]  J. L. Mcclelland Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.