Functional organs and computer use within collaborative group projects

Abstract In this article I apply the concept of a functional organ to explain the use of computers within interdisciplinary and authentic group projects completed as part of a business degree at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand. The concept, which is described by a model contained within the theory of activity first formulated by Leont’ev, helped to unravel the complexity involved in these incidences of joint activity and also clarified the relationship between the computer, as a cultural tool, and the members of the groups. Implications and challenges facing this approach are also discussed.

[1]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving , 1992 .

[2]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[3]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[4]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context , 1998 .

[5]  V. Kaptelinin.  Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[6]  James A. Middleton,et al.  Shopping for Technology , 1997 .

[7]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[8]  Kay Fielden.  Balancing at the Edge of Chaos in a Sociotechnical World , 2000 .

[9]  Agnès Blaye,et al.  Collaborative learning at the computer; How social processes ‘interface’ with human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[10]  Dianne Willis,et al.  The New Sociotech: Graffiti on the Long Wall , 2000 .

[11]  J. Wertsch.  Mind as action , 1998 .

[12]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[13]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[14]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Computer-mediated activity: functional organs in social and developmental contexts , 1995 .

[15]  Gavriel Salomon.  Effects with and of computers and the study of computer-based learning environments , 1992 .

[16]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  A. N. Leont’ev.  On Vygotsky’s Creative Development , 1997 .

[18]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[19]  A. Kozulin.  Psychological Tools: A Sociocultural Approach to Education , 1998 .

[20]  N. Denzin.  The art and politics of interpretation. , 1994 .

[21]  Vladimir P. Zinchenko.  Developing activity theory: the zone of proximal development and beyond , 1995 .

[22]  Stephen W. Draper,et al.  Niche-based success in CAL , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[23]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .