Phase III Clinical Trial (RERISE study) Results of Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Purpose: Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in Korea for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in patients newly diagnosed or with insufficient response to other TKIs. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radotinib as first-line therapy for CML-CP. Experimental Design: This multinational, open-label study assigned patients (1:1:1) to one of two twice-daily radotinib doses, or imatinib daily. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. Results: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized to receive radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg twice-daily (n = 81), or imatinib 400 mg daily (n = 81). MMR rates by 12 months were higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg (52%) or radotinib 400 mg twice-daily (46%) versus imatinib (30%; P = 0.0044 and P = 0.0342, respectively). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 12 months were higher for radotinib 300 mg (91%) versus imatinib (77%; P = 0.0120). Early molecular response at 3 months occurred in 86% and 87% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg and radotinib 400 mg, respectively, and 71% of those receiving imatinib. By 12 months, no patients had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Most adverse events were manageable with dose reduction. Conclusions: Radotinib demonstrated superiority over imatinib in CCyR and MMR in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01511289. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7180–8. ©2017 AACR.

[1]  Dae Jin Jo,et al.  Impact of Body Weight Adjusted Dose on Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2016 .

[2]  Sukjoong Oh,et al.  Optimization of radotinib doses for the treatment of Asian patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia based on dose-response relationship analyses , 2016, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[3]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  I. Flinn,et al.  Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial , 2016, Leukemia.

[5]  L. Akard,et al.  Considering baseline factors and early response rates to optimize therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase , 2016, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[6]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Phase 3 study of nilotinib vs imatinib in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTchina. , 2015, Blood.

[7]  Dong-Wook Kim,et al.  Distinct predictive factors influence on achievement of early molecular response by frontline imatinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2015, Leukemia research.

[8]  M. Deininger,et al.  Radotinib is an Effective Inhibitor of Native and Kinase Domain-Mutant BCR-ABL1 , 2015, Leukemia.

[9]  Sukjoong Oh,et al.  Efficacy and safety of radotinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2014, Haematologica.

[10]  R. Larson,et al.  Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. , 2014, Blood.

[11]  C. Chuah,et al.  Efficacy and safety of dasatinib versus imatinib in the East Asian subpopulation of the DASISION trial of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase , 2013, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[12]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. , 2013, Blood.

[13]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Combining BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 and 6 months in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for early intervention strategies. , 2013, Blood.

[14]  H. Einsele,et al.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) , 2012, Leukemia.

[15]  R. Larson,et al.  Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase , 2011, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[16]  A. Nagler,et al.  Multicenter independent assessment of outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Ricardo Pasquini,et al.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Gordon Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2010 .

[19]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Clinical profile of dasatinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2009, International journal of hematology.

[20]  H. Mitsuya,et al.  Relationship between an effective dose of imatinib, body surface area, and trough drug levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2009, International journal of hematology.

[21]  W. Au,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia in Asia , 2009, International journal of hematology.

[22]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Dasatinib pharmacokinetics and exposure-response (E-R): Relationship to safety and efficacy in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) , 2008 .

[23]  Tillmann Krahnke,et al.  Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. , 2008, Blood.

[24]  Nicholas Moore,et al.  Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[25]  S. Sawada,et al.  Effects of lower dose of imatinib to CML patients. , 2003, Leukemia research.

[26]  Susan M. Watanabe,et al.  An alteration of the human c-abl protein in K562 leukemia cells unmasks associated tyrosine kinase activity , 1984, Cell.

[27]  J. Rowley A New Consistent Chromosomal Abnormality in Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia identified by Quinacrine Fluorescence and Giemsa Staining , 1973, Nature.

[28]  P. Nowell,et al.  A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia , 1960 .