Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640

Background: Diabetes mellitus is an important diagnosis. New criteria have been defined for impaired glucose metabolism and, accordingly, there is a need for precise and accurate glucose analysis for the correct classification of patients. However, neither the World Health Organisation nor the National Service Framework for Diabetes in England and Wales deal with the associated analytical issues for plasma glucose. Aims/Methods: To compare two different methods for plasma glucose with respect to European and CLIA ’88 quality requirements. Results: Using several different graphical and statistical techniques, the YSI 2300 STAT was found to be 8.1–8.4% negatively biased for plasma glucose when compared with the Olympus AU640 method. Conclusions: Such a large bias would have a large impact on the detection of diabetes mellitus in clinical practice and therefore this method should not be used to make a definitive diagnosis. The bias probably results from the fact that the YSI 2300 STAT uses an aqueous based standard.

[1]  S. Hollis Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1996, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[2]  Jean-Claude Libeer,et al.  Proposals for Setting Generally Applicable Quality Goals Solely Based on Biology , 1997, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[3]  I. Brandslund,et al.  Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[4]  Westgard Jo,et al.  A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx chart) for judging method performance. , 1995 .

[5]  K S Chua,et al.  Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose Analyzer. , 1978, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  M. Fantone,et al.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[7]  K. Linnet,et al.  Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  C G Fraser,et al.  Introduction: strategies to set global quality specifications in laboratory medicine. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  X. Fuentes-Arderiu,et al.  Intra- and inter-individual biological variability data bank. , 1997, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[11]  P. Raskin,et al.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. , 1999, Diabetes care.