Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analog filtering.

The effect of analog filtering on the middle latency auditory response (MLAR) was investigated. Substantial waveform distortions and latency shifts were found when using similar filter settings as reported in the literature. The waveform changes amounted to complete polarity reversal of the Na-Pa-Nb pattern due to the high-pass cut-off with a steep slope characteristic. The analog filters were simulated by recursive digital filters and compared with symmetrical digital filters having the same cut-off frequency and slope. MLAR waveform and latencies were scarcely affected by the digital zero-phase shift filters. In contrast, the oscillations in the step function response of the analog filter elucidated how early activity of the MLAR is folded onto later components, leading to a much larger late activity than present physiologically. Since physiological interpretations of the MLAR ought to rely on unbiased recordings, minimal usage of analog filtering is recommended.

[1]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  C. K. Yuen,et al.  Digital Filters , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  T. Suzuki,et al.  Effect of high-pass filter on auditory brain stem responses to tone pips. , 1977, Scandinavian audiology.

[4]  M Scherg,et al.  Simultaneous recording and separation of early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Reexamination of effects of stimulus rate and number on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  D. J. Doyle,et al.  Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  R. Cracco,et al.  Scalp recorded auditory evoked potentials and sonomotor responses: an evaluation of components and recording techniques. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Effects of stimulus rise-fall time and equivalent duration on middle components of AER. , 1980, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  J. Suzuki,et al.  Effects of number and interstimulus interval of tone pips on fast responses. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  A R Thornton,et al.  Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on the middle componenets of the averaged auditory eletroencephalic response. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  M I Mendel,et al.  The effect of test conditions on the early components of the averaged electroencephalic response. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  C. Elberling Auditory electrophysiology: spectral analysis of cochlear and brain stem evoked potentials. A comment on: Kevanishvili and Aphonchenko: "Frequency composition of brain stem auditory evoked potentials". , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.