The Need for a Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory for Assessing Innovations in Introductory Astronomy Survey Courses

In this era of dramatically increased astronomy education research efforts, there is a growing need for standardized evaluation protocols and a strategy to assess both student comprehension of fundamental concepts and the success of innovative instructional interventions. Of the many topics that could be taught in an introductory astronomy course, the nature of light and the electromagnetic spectrum is by far the most universally covered topic. Yet, to the surprise and disappointment of instructors, many students struggle to understand underlying fundamental concepts related to light, such as blackbody radiation, Wien’s law, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and the nature and causes of emission and absorption line spectra. Motivated by predecessor instruments such as the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), the Astronomy Diagnostic Test (ADT), and the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory (LPCI), we call for, and are working on, the development and validation of a Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory. This assessment instrument should measure students’ conceptual understanding of light and spectroscopy and gauge the effectiveness of classroom instruction in promoting student learning in the introductory astronomy survey course.

[1]  Robert W. Alexander Assessment of Teaching Approaches in an Introductory Astronomy College Classroom , 2004 .

[2]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Learner-Centered Astronomy Teaching: Strategies for ASTRO 101 , 2002 .

[3]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  The Role of Assessment in the Development of the College Introductory Astronomy Course , 2001 .

[4]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  What topics are taught in introductory astronomy courses , 2001 .

[5]  B. Hufnagel,et al.  Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test , 2001 .

[6]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[7]  Rebecca S. Lindell,et al.  Using the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory to Investigate College Students’ Pre‐instructional Mental Models of Lunar Phases , 2004 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[9]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non-Science Majors , 2004 .

[10]  Rebecca S. Lindell,et al.  Measuring Conceptual Change in College Students’ Understanding of Lunar Phases , 2005 .

[11]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy , 1982 .

[12]  M. Zeilik,et al.  What Are Essential Concepts in ``Astronomy 101''? A New Approach to Find Consensus from Two Different Samples of Instructors , 2004 .

[13]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[14]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  A Review of Astronomy Education Research , 2003 .

[15]  Grace L. Deming Results from the Astronomy Diagnostic Test National Project , 2001 .

[16]  Rebecca Susan Lindell Enhancing college students' understanding of lunar phases , 2001 .

[17]  Rebecca S. Lindell,et al.  Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory , 2002 .

[18]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .