Epigenomic Enhancer Profiling Defines a Signature of Colon Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Signature The mutations and genome aberrations that characterize cancer result in often dramatically altered gene and protein expression patterns. It is these altered expression patterns that directly and indirectly drive progression of the disease. In human primary colorectal cancer cells, Akhtar-Zaidi et al. (p. 736, published online 12 April) analyzed the pattern of epigenetically modified chromatin at “enhancer” sequences that are known to be critical in the control of gene expression. An epigenetic enhancer signature was defined that was specifically associated with colorectal cancer cells. Methylation tags at long-distance gene regulatory elements provide a signature specific to cancer cells. Cancer is characterized by gene expression aberrations. Studies have largely focused on coding sequences and promoters, even though distal regulatory elements play a central role in controlling transcription patterns. We used the histone mark H3K4me1 to analyze gain and loss of enhancer activity genome-wide in primary colon cancer lines relative to normal colon crypts. We identified thousands of variant enhancer loci (VELs) that comprise a signature that is robustly predictive of the in vivo colon cancer transcriptome. Furthermore, VELs are enriched in haplotype blocks containing colon cancer genetic risk variants, implicating these genomic regions in colon cancer pathogenesis. We propose that reproducible changes in the epigenome at enhancer elements drive a specific transcriptional program to promote colon carcinogenesis.

[1]  Mathieu Lemire,et al.  Genotype–Environment Interactions in Microsatellite Stable/Microsatellite Instability-Low Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Genome-Wide Association Study , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  Common variant in 6q26-q27 is associated with distal colon cancer in an Asian population , 2011, Gut.

[3]  Jean-Baptiste Cazier,et al.  Meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies identifies susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer at 1q41, 3q26.2, 12q13.13 and 20q13.33 , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Sole-Search: an integrated analysis program for peak detection and functional annotation using ChIP-seq data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Steven Gallinger,et al.  Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24 , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[6]  C. Carlson,et al.  Meta-analysis of new genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer risk , 2011, Human Genetics.

[7]  Oliver Sieber,et al.  A genome-wide association study shows that common alleles of SMAD7 influence colorectal cancer risk , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  Global analysis of the insulator binding protein CTCF in chromatin barrier regions reveals demarcation of active and repressive domains. , 2008, Genome research.

[9]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[10]  Julian Peto,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies colorectal cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 10p14 and 8q23.3 , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[11]  A. Sparks,et al.  The Genomic Landscapes of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers , 2007, Science.

[12]  T. P. Pretlow,et al.  15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is an in vivo suppressor of colon tumorigenesis , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Kristian Cibulskis,et al.  Genomic sequencing of colorectal adenocarcinomas identifies a recurrent VTI1A-TCF7L2 fusion , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Michael D. Wilson,et al.  ChIP-seq: using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein-DNA interactions. , 2009, Methods.

[15]  M. Bucan,et al.  Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy , 2005, Genome Biology.

[16]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  Systematic analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types , 2011, Nature.

[17]  Michael Krawczak,et al.  Genome-wide association study for colorectal cancer identifies risk polymorphisms in German familial cases and implicates MAPK signalling pathways in disease susceptibility. , 2010, Carcinogenesis.

[18]  A. West,et al.  The Protein CTCF Is Required for the Enhancer Blocking Activity of Vertebrate Insulators , 1999, Cell.

[19]  Steven Gallinger,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[20]  I. Deary,et al.  Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21 , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Ryan A. Flynn,et al.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans , 2011, Nature.

[22]  Z. Weng,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping and Characterization of Open Chromatin across the Genome , 2008, Cell.

[23]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[25]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[26]  J. Potter,et al.  Variants on 9p24 and 8q24 are associated with risk of colorectal cancer: results from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. , 2007, Cancer research.

[27]  P. Broderick,et al.  The 14q22.2 colorectal cancer variant rs4444235 shows cis-acting regulation of BMP4 , 2012, Oncogene.

[28]  J. Willson,et al.  Cell culture of human colon adenomas and carcinomas. , 1987, Cancer research.

[29]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers , 2006, Science.

[30]  P. Scacheri,et al.  Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. , 2011, Genome research.

[31]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[32]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.