In Vivo Tumor Grading of Prostate Cancer Using Quantitative 111In-Capromab Pendetide SPECT/CT

We have developed an in vivo method to quantify antibody uptake using 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT combined with CT (SPECT/CT). Our goal was to evaluate this method for potential grading of prostate tumors. Methods: Our phantom experiments focused on the robustness of an advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm that involves corrections for photon attenuation, scatter, and geometric blurring caused by radionuclide collimators. The conversion factors between image values and tracer concentrations (in Bq/mL) were calculated from a uniform phantom filled with an aqueous solution of 111InCl3 using the same acquisition protocol and reconstruction parameters as for patient studies. In addition, the spatial resolution of the reconstructed images was measured from a point source phantom. The measured spatial resolution was modeled into a point-spread function, and the point-spread function was implemented in a deconvolution-based partial-volume-error correction algorithm. The recovery capability to correctly estimate true tracer concentrations was tested using prostatelike and bladderlike lesion phantoms fitted in the modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association/International Electrotechnical Commission body phantom. Patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (n = 10) who underwent prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled in the preoperative SPECT/CT studies at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The CT portion of SPECT/CT was used to generate CT-based attenuation maps and as an anatomic localization tool for clinical interpretation. Pathologic Gleason grades were compared with in vivo antibody uptake value (AUV) normalized by injected dose, effective half-life, and injection-scan time difference. AUVs were calculated in each lobe of the prostate gland with cylindric volumes of interest having dimensions of 1.5 cm in both diameter and height. Results: Reconstructed SPECT images further corrected by the deconvolution-based partial-volume-error correction could recover tracer concentrations up to 90% of true values in measurements of phantom volumes as small as 7.77 mL. From patient studies, there was a statistically significant correlation (ρ = 0.71, P = 0.033) between higher AUVs (from either left or right lobe) and higher components of pathologic Gleason scores. Conclusion: Our results strongly indicate potential for noninvasive prostate tumor grading using quantitative 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

[1]  Lennart Franzén,et al.  How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Bandstra,et al.  Measurements of Fukushima fallout by the Berkeley Radiological Air and Water Monitoring project , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopic Imaging of Prostate Cancer , 2001, Cancer investigation.

[4]  Kenneth H. Wong,et al.  Progress in SPECT/CT Imaging of Prostate Cancer , 2006, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[5]  B. Leibovich,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Kattan,et al.  Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with gleason score based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Martin G Pomper,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate-urea-lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. , 2009, Cancer research.

[8]  Anna Celler,et al.  Implementation of an iterative scatter correction, the influence of attenuation map quality and their effect on absolute quantitation in SPECT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  J R Perry,et al.  Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Kenneth H. Wong,et al.  Calculation and validation of the use of effective attenuation coefficient for attenuation correction in In-111 SPECT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  S C Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[12]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[13]  Floris P Jansen,et al.  The future of SPECT in a time of PET. , 2007, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[14]  Ernest V. Garcia,et al.  Spect attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology’s manifest destiny , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  Youngho Seo,et al.  Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[16]  Mingshan Sun,et al.  Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  M. Manyak,et al.  Indium-111 capromab pendetide in the management of recurrent prostate cancer , 2008, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[18]  Michael Lassmann,et al.  The impact of PET and SPECT on dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[19]  Zheng Chang,et al.  Problems created in attenuation-corrected SPECT images by artifacts in attenuation maps: a simulation study. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  S. Campbell,et al.  Long-term follow-up of 111In-capromab pendetide (ProstaScint) scan as pretreatment assessment in patients who undergo salvage radiotherapy for rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  D. Gleason,et al.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. , 1992, Human pathology.

[23]  A. Markham,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[24]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. , 1998, Urology.

[25]  S. Libutti,et al.  Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  W P Segars,et al.  Fast modelling of the collimator–detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.