Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms

The purpose was to evaluate MR colonography (MRC) with barium fecal tagging in detecting colorectal pathology and to determine how air-based and water-based colonic distension influences MRC. We studied 83 patients with high risk of colonic neoplasms. All received oral barium sulfate for colonic preparation before unenhanced and enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MRC using either water (n=54) or air (n=29) for colonic distension. Fecal tagging, distension, and artifacts were recorded. All patients underwent conventional colonoscopy within 2 weeks of MRC; the techniques were compared for detection of malignant neoplasms and polyps ≥1 cm, 6–9 mm, and ≤5 mm. Fecal tagging was “good” in 76% of the colonic segments in water-distended patients and 46% of air-distended patients. The degree of distension was “good” in 90.7% of water-distended patients and 44% of air-distended patients. Severe artifacts were present in 15% air-distended patients and 0.3% of water-distended patients. Both water-distended and air-distended MRC detected all malignant neoplasms and polyps ≥1 cm, but more air-distended MRC were excluded for poor quality. MRC with fecal tagging is useful for detecting lesions ≥1 cm. Air distension was inferior to water distension in most aspects. Water-based colonic distension should be used for barium-tagging MRC.

[1]  G. Marchal,et al.  Clinical validation of high‐resolution fast spin‐echo MR colonography after colon distention with air , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  W. Atkin,et al.  Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps , 2002, Gut.

[3]  Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  M. Goyen,et al.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)—a feasibility study , 2005, European Radiology.

[5]  C. Johnson,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  S. Ruehm,et al.  Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance , 2005, Abdominal Imaging.

[7]  G. Gerken,et al.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population , 2007, Gut.

[8]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients’ acceptance in a screening population , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  S. Ruehm,et al.  MR colonography: How does air compare to water for colonic distention? , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  N. So,et al.  Screening of colonic tumors by air‐inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[13]  G. Williams A long hard look at Dukes' B , 2002, Gut.

[14]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Debatin,et al.  Virtual magnetic resonance colonography , 2003, Gut.

[16]  G. Layer,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. , 2006, Radiology.

[17]  Gerald Holtmann,et al.  MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  G. Holtmann,et al.  MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  G. Gerken,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of dark‐lumen MR colonography: Clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  K. Leung,et al.  Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[21]  J F Debatin,et al.  Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[23]  J. Debatin,et al.  Dark-lumen MR colonography , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[24]  C. Johnson,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[25]  J. Saurin,et al.  [Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults]. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.