THE MITIGATION OF SCIENTIFIC CLAIMS IN RESEARCH PAPERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

In the context of academic writing, authors tend to mitigate the force of their scientific claims by means of hedging devices in order to reduce the risk of opposition and minimise the face threatening acts that are involved in the making of claims. This study explores the phenomenon of hedging in the research article (RA) from a cross-cultural perspective. To this end, a total of 40 RAs written in English and Spanish in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology were analysed in terms of the frequency of occurrence and distribution of the various strategies and the linguistic devices associated to each strategy which perform a hedging function in the different structural units of the articles. The results of the comparative quantitative analyses revealed that there are similarities between the two languages regarding the distribution of hedges across the structural units of the RAs, although a certain degree of rhetorical variation was also found mainly in terms of the frequency of use of the strategy of indetermination (i.e. modality devices and approximators) which occurs to a much greater extent in the English texts. This suggests that the English RAs in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology, as a whole, involve more protection to the author’s face.

[1]  George Lakoff,et al.  Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts , 1973, J. Philos. Log..

[2]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[3]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[4]  E. Ventola Modalization: Probability – an exploration into its role in academic writing , 1997 .

[5]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[6]  Sònia Oliver del Olmo ANÁLISIS CONTRASTIVO ESPAÑOL/INGLÉS DE LA ATENUACIÓN RETÓRICA EN EL DISCURSO MÉDICO EL ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y EL CASO CLÍNICO , 2004 .

[7]  Eija Ventola,et al.  Academic writing: intercultural and textual issues , 1996 .

[8]  Raija Markkanen,et al.  How to Tell the Truth in The British Medical Journal: Patterns of Judgement in the 19th and 20th Centuries , 1997 .

[9]  Peter Crompton,et al.  Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems , 1997 .

[10]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[11]  D. Allison Research Genres: Exploration and Applications, J.M. Swales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004), (pages xii and 314, US$35.00), ISBN: 0521533341 , 2006 .

[12]  G. Clemen,et al.  The Concept of Hedging: Origins, Approaches and Definitions , 1997 .

[13]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks , 1994 .

[14]  J. Swales Research Genres: Explorations and Applications , 2004 .

[15]  Santiago Posteguillo Gómez Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes , 1998 .

[16]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , 1986 .

[17]  Contrastive Text Linguistics in LSP-Research: Theoretical Considerations and some Preliminary Findings , 1991 .

[18]  Raija Markkanen,et al.  Hedging: A Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis , 1997 .

[19]  Walter Nash The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse , 1990 .

[20]  P. Crompton Identifying Hedges: Definition or divination? , 1998 .

[21]  Heinz Kreutz,et al.  Some observations on the distribution and function of hedging in German and English academic writing , 1997 .

[22]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in scientific research articles , 1998 .

[23]  Procrustes' Recipe: Hedging and Positivism. , 2000 .

[24]  K. Hyland,et al.  Talking to the Academy , 1996 .

[25]  Michael Clyne,et al.  The Sociocultural Dimension: The Dilemma of the German-speaking Scholar , 1991 .

[26]  P. G. Meyer,et al.  Hedging Strategies in Written Academic Discourse: Strengthening the Argument by Weakening the Claim , 1997 .

[27]  Language is not a physical object , 1998 .

[28]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .