Using propensity score modeling to minimize the influence of confounding risks related to prenatal tobacco exposure.

INTRODUCTION Despite efforts to control for confounding variables using stringent sampling plans, selection bias typically exists in observational studies, resulting in unbalanced comparison groups. Ignoring selection bias can result in unreliable or misleading estimates of the causal effect. METHODS Generalized boosted models were used to estimate propensity scores from 42 confounding variables for a sample of 361 neonates. Using emergent neonatal attention and orientation skills as an example developmental outcome, we examined the impact of tobacco exposure with and without accounting for selection bias. Weight at birth, an outcome related to tobacco exposure, also was used to examine the functionality of the propensity score approach. RESULTS Without inclusion of propensity scores, tobacco-exposed neonates did not differ from their nonexposed peers in attention skills over the first month or in weight at birth. When the propensity score was included as a covariate, exposed infants had marginally lower attention and a slower linear change rate at 4 weeks, with greater quadratic deceleration over the first month. Similarly, exposure-related differences in birth weight emerged when propensity scores were included as a covariate. CONCLUSIONS The propensity score method captured the selection bias intrinsic to this observational study of prenatal tobacco exposure. Selection bias obscured the deleterious impact of tobacco exposure on the development of neonatal attention. The illustrated analytic strategy offers an example to better characterize the impact of prenatal tobacco exposure on important developmental outcomes by directly modeling and statistically accounting for the selection bias from the sampling process.

[1]  Nancy Mather,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. , 2009 .

[2]  Albert Satorra,et al.  Scaled and Adjusted Restricted Tests in Multi Sample Analysis of Moment Structures , 1999 .

[3]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[4]  Paul R Rosenbaum,et al.  Rare Outcomes, Common Treatments: Analytic Strategies Using Propensity Scores , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[6]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[7]  B. Lester,et al.  Low-level prenatal exposure to nicotine and infant neurobehavior. , 2009, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[8]  S. Homan,et al.  Persistent tobacco use during pregnancy and the likelihood of psychiatric disorders. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[9]  P. Remington,et al.  Depression and the dynamics of smoking. A national perspective. , 1990, JAMA.

[10]  Albert Satorra,et al.  Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis : a festschrift for Heinz Neudecker , 2000 .

[11]  N. Breslau Psychiatric comorbidity of smoking and nicotine dependence , 1995, Behavior genetics.

[12]  L. Derogatis,et al.  Brief Symptom Inventory Bsi Administration Scoring And Procedures Manual >>>CLICK HERE<<< , 1993 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[14]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  The psychosocial context of pregnancy smoking and quitting in the Millennium Cohort Study , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[15]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[16]  E. Schisterman,et al.  Misclassification of maternal smoking status and its effects on an epidemiologic study of pregnancy outcomes. , 2007, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[17]  G. Lindmark,et al.  Psychosocial predictors of smoking and exercise during pregnancy , 2000 .

[18]  M. Klebanoff,et al.  Smoking and Drinking During Pregnancy: Their Effects on Preterm Birth , 1986 .

[19]  J. Carlin,et al.  Depression, anxiety, and smoking initiation: a prospective study over 3 years. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[20]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[21]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[23]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[24]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  Boosting With the L2 Loss , 2003 .

[25]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Causal inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. , 2000 .

[26]  F. Voorhorst,et al.  Assessment of tobacco-exposure during pregnancy; behavioural and biochemical changes. , 1991, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[27]  L. Wakschlag,et al.  Does a childhood history of externalizing problems predict smoking during pregnancy? , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[28]  R. D. Eiden,et al.  The association between maternal smoking and secondhand exposure and autonomic functioning at 2-4 weeks of age. , 2006, Infant behavior & development.

[29]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[30]  M. Riese,et al.  Implications of sex differences in neonatal temperament for early risk and developmental/environmental interactions. , 1986, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[31]  G. Imbens Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Eects under Exogeneity: A Review , 2003 .

[32]  M. L. Riese Procedures and norms for assessing behavioral patterns in full-term and stable pre-term neonates , 1981 .

[33]  R. Goodwin,et al.  Mental Disorders and Nicotine Dependence Among Pregnant Women in the United States , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  R. D'Agostino Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  H. Odendaal Smoking and drinking during pregnancy : editorial , 2008 .

[36]  K. Yuan,et al.  5. Three Likelihood-Based Methods for Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis with Nonnormal Missing Data , 2000 .

[37]  I. Deary,et al.  Hostility, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption in the general population. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[38]  S. Wiebe,et al.  Prenatal tobacco exposure: developmental outcomes in the neonatal period. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[39]  R. Harris,et al.  Nicotine addiction and comorbidity with alcohol abuse and mental illness , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[41]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  Assessing the Effect of Race Bias in Post-traffic Stop Outcomes Using Propensity Scores , 2006 .

[42]  J. Lumley Stopping smoking , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[43]  D. Fergusson,et al.  Major depression and cigarette smoking: results of a 21-year longitudinal study , 2003, Psychological Medicine.

[44]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[45]  A. Woodward,et al.  Effects of maternal smoking upon neuropsychological development in early childhood: importance of taking account of social and environmental factors. , 1992, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[46]  P. Donnan,et al.  Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitations , 2001, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[47]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[48]  Michael Weitzman,et al.  Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children's health. , 2004, Pediatrics.