Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Miller,et al. Sensory evaluation of tender beef strip loin steaks of varying marbling levels and quality treatments. , 2015, Meat science.
[2] M. Miller,et al. Consumer assessment of beef palatability from four beef muscles from USDA Choice and Select graded carcasses. , 2014, Meat science.
[3] J. D. Tatum,et al. Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes. , 2013, Journal of animal science.
[4] D. S. Hale,et al. National Beef Tenderness Survey-2010: Warner-Bratzler shear force values and sensory panel ratings for beef steaks from United States retail and food service establishments. , 2013, Journal of animal science.
[5] B. Johnson,et al. Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels. , 2012, Journal of animal science.
[6] A. Reicks,et al. Demographics and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roasts. , 2011, Meat science.
[7] J. D. Tatum,et al. Effects of postmortem aging and USDA quality grade on Warner-Bratzler shear force values of seventeen individual beef muscles. , 2006, Journal of animal science.
[8] J. O. Reagan,et al. Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks. , 2005, Journal of animal science.
[9] D. Wulf,et al. Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib. , 2004, Journal of animal science.
[10] J. Savell,et al. Warner-Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles. , 2003, Meat science.
[11] B. Giménez,et al. Shear values of raw samples of 14 bovine muscles and their relation to muscle collagen characteristics. , 2003, Meat science.
[12] J. O. Reagan,et al. Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values. , 2003, Journal of animal science.
[13] M. Miller,et al. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. , 2001, Journal of animal science.
[14] J. O. Reagan,et al. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak. , 1999, Journal of animal science.
[15] D. S. Hale,et al. Determination of sensory, chemical and cooking characteristics of retail beef cuts differing in intramuscular and external fat. , 1998, Meat science.
[16] J. O. Reagan,et al. Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. , 1998, Journal of animal science.
[17] S. Shackelford,et al. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. , 1995, Journal of animal science.
[18] M. Miller,et al. Consumer Acceptability of Beef Steak Tenderness in the Home and Restaurant , 1995 .
[19] T. R. Dutson,et al. Factors associated with the tenderness of three bovine muscles. , 1988 .
[20] G. W. Davis,et al. RELATIONSHIP OF USDA QUALITY GRADES TO PALATABILITY OF COOKED BEEF , 1987 .
[21] G. W. Davis,et al. RELATIONSHIP OF USDA MARBLING GROUPS TO PALATABILITY OF COOKED BEEF , 1985 .
[22] J. D. Tatum,et al. Carcass Characteristics, Time on Feed and Cooked Beef Palatability Attributes , 1980 .
[23] H. B. Hedrick,et al. PROFILE OF FIBER TYPES AND RELATED PROPERTIES OF FIVE BOVINE MUSCLES , 1977 .
[24] H. Cross,et al. Beef Palatability as Affected by Cooking Rate and Final Internal Temperature1 , 1976 .
[25] A. Kotula,et al. Quality Characteristics of Bovine Meat. II. Beef Tenderness in Relation to Individual Muscles, Age and Sex of Animals and Carcass Quality Grade , 1975 .
[26] R. E. Rust,et al. Effect of Degree of Marbling and Internal Temperature of Doneness on Beef Rib Steaks , 1973 .
[27] H. Fitzhugh,et al. Influence of Carcass Position During Rigor Mortis on Tenderness of Beef Muscles: Comparison of two Treatments , 1970 .
[28] R. Cassens,et al. Further Studies on Bovine Muscle Tenderness as Influenced by Carcass Position, Sarcomere Length, and Fiber Diameter , 1965 .