Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study

Sustainability is a holistic and complex multi-dimensional concept comprising economic, social and environmental issues. The EU Sustainable Development Goals’ indicator set, developed by European Commission, is implemented online in Eurostat’s database and constitutes the basis for assessing the level of sustainability assessment in different areas. The integration of the sustainability indicators was carried out in many studies by using the multi-criteria techniques. This work proposes a new methodological framework based on extended TOPSIS procedure, which takes into account EU targets and/or national targets in building positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution. This algorithm allows compensatory and non-compensatory approach in integrated sustainability assessment from the target point of view. This framework has been applied to measure sustainable development in the area of education in 28 EU countries in 2015. The results of this research also illustrate the complexity of measuring sustainable development, where multiple sustainability criteria and targets are considered.

[1]  R. Ayres,et al.  Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences, and consilience , 2001 .

[2]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[5]  S. Greco,et al.  Axiomatization of utility, outranking and decision-rule preference models for multiple-criteria classification problems under partial inconsistency with the dominance principle , 2002 .

[6]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part I: Problem structuring , 2005 .

[7]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Hasan Ture,et al.  Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2018, Social Indicators Research.

[9]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part II: Problem analysis , 2005 .

[10]  E. Neumayer.  Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring The Limits Of Two Opposing Paradigms , 2010 .

[11]  Ignacio C. Fernández,et al.  When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators , 2017 .

[12]  Antonio Boggia,et al.  Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[15]  G. Munda.  “Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework , 2005 .

[16]  Tomasz Wachowicz,et al.  Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM , 1986 .

[18]  Piwowarski Mateusz,et al.  TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries , 2018 .

[19]  Unced.  Rio Declaration on Environment and Development , 1992 .

[20]  P Ekins,et al.  A Framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability , 2005 .

[21]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[22]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  The future we want: Key issues on sustainable development in higher education after Rio and the UN decade of education for sustainable development , 2015 .

[24]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[25]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[26]  Silvia Albareda-Tiana,et al.  Implementing the sustainable development goals at University level , 2018 .

[27]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[28]  S. Zinatizadeh.  MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION IN URBAN AREAS: A CASE STUDY FOR KERMANSHAH CITY, IRAN , 2017 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[30]  Ian Jeffreys.  The use of compensatory and non-compensatory multi-criteria analysis for small-scale forestry , 2004, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy.

[31]  Sandra Miranda Neves,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[32]  Maite Cabeza-Gutes,et al.  On the Concept of Weak Sustainability , 1995 .

[33]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[34]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  An Approximate Measure of Value , 1954, Oper. Res..

[35]  Stanislav Kološta,et al.  Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD index , 2015 .

[36]  B. Roy.  THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[37]  Simon Dietz,et al.  Weak and Strong Sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and Measurement , 2007 .

[38]  J. O’Flaherty,et al.  The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research , 2018 .

[39]  E. Roszkowska.  Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview , 2013 .

[40]  Marco Cinelli,et al.  Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[41]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[42]  Maite Cabeza Gutés.  The concept of weak sustainability , 1996 .