Aspects of Uncertainty Analysis for Large Nonlinear Computational Models

This paper concerns the analysis of how uncertainty propagates through large computational models like finite element models. If a model is expensive to run, a Monte Carlo approach based on sampling over the possible model inputs will not be feasible, because the large number of model runs will be prohibitively expensive. Fortunately, an alternative to Monte Carlo is available in the form of the established Bayesian algorithm discussed here; this algorithm can provide information about uncertainty with many less model runs than Monte Carlo requires. The algorithm also provides information regarding sensitivity to the inputs i.e. the extent to which input uncertainties are responsible for output uncertainty. After describing the basic principles of the Bayesian approach, it is illustrated via two case studies: the first concerns a finite element model of a human heart valve and the second, an airship model incorporating fluid structure interaction.

[1]  D. G. Kendall,et al.  Method of statistical testing : Monte Carlo method , 1965 .

[2]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[4]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Peculiar Performance of a New Lighter-Than-Air Platform for Monitoring , 2004 .

[5]  Marc C. Kennedy,et al.  Case studies in Gaussian process modelling of computer codes , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  S. Rahman Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2011 .

[7]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[8]  A. Ranga,et al.  Large-displacement 3D structural analysis of an aortic valve model with nonlinear material properties , 2004, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[9]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[10]  M. Thubrikar The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[11]  A. Huerta,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods , 2004 .

[12]  George J. Klir,et al.  On Measuring Uncertainty and Uncertainty-Based Information: Recent Developments , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[15]  I. C. Howard,et al.  An approach to the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Structures with Large Stochastic Variations , 2003 .

[17]  B. Lallemand,et al.  FUZZY MODAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES WITH IMPRECISE MATERIAL PROPERTIES , 1999 .

[19]  I Vesely,et al.  Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.