A safe harbor can protect an endangered species from its predators

The objective is the study of the dynamics of a prey–predator model where the prey species can migrate between two patches. The specialist predator is confined to the first patch, where it consumes the prey following the simple law of mass action. The prey is further “endangered” in that it suffers from the strong Allee effect, assumed to occur due to the lowering of successful matings. In the second patch the prey grows logistically. The model is formulated in a comprehensive way so as to include specialist as well as generalist predators, as a continuum of possible behaviors. This model described by a set of three ordinary differential equation is an extension of some previous models proposed and analysed in the literature on metapopulation models. The following analysis issues will be addressed: boundedness of the solution, equilibrium feasibility and stability, and dynamic behaviour dependency of the population and environmental parameters. Three types for both equilibria and limit cycles are possible: trivial, predator-free and coexistence. Classical analysis techniques are used and also theoretical and numerical bifurcation analysis. Besides the well-known local bifurcations, also a homoclinic connection as a global bifurcation is calculated. In view of the difficulty in the analysis, only the specialist case will be analysed. The obtained results indicate that the safe harbor can protect the endangered species under certain parametric restrictions.

[1]  Vincent A. A. Jansen,et al.  Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions:a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment. , 1995 .

[2]  Ezio Venturino,et al.  Simple Metaecoepidemic Models , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  H. I. Freedman,et al.  Mathematical Models of Population Interactions with Dispersal. I: Stability of Two Habitats with and without a Predator , 1977 .

[4]  Eduardo González-Olivares,et al.  Multiple Limit Cycles in a Gause Type Predator–Prey Model with Holling Type III Functional Response and Allee Effect on Prey , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[5]  W. C. Allee.  Animal aggregations, a study in general sociology. / by W. C. Allee. , 1931 .

[6]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Persistence and stability of seed-dispersed species in a patchy environment. , 1979, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Brian Dennis,et al.  ALLEE EFFECTS: POPULATION GROWTH, CRITICAL DENSITY, AND THE CHANCE OF EXTINCTION , 1989 .

[8]  Ezio Venturino,et al.  The consequences of habitat fragmentation on disease propagation , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[9]  Y. Kuznetsov.  Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[10]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  New features of the software MatCont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems , 2008 .

[11]  J. Gascoigne,et al.  Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation , 2008 .

[12]  James D. Murray.  Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[13]  Ludek Berec,et al.  Multiple Allee effects and population management. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Ezio Venturino,et al.  Migration Paths Saturations in Meta-epidemic Systems , 2014, ICCSA.

[15]  E. Venturino,et al.  On the principle of competitive exclusion in metapopulation models , 2014, 1403.1173.

[16]  E. Venturino,et al.  Dynamics of different topological configurations in a three-patch metapopulation model , 2014, 1403.4457.

[17]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What Is the Allee Effect , 1999 .

[18]  Malay Banerjee,et al.  Bifurcation analysis of a ratio-dependent prey-predator model with the Allee effect , 2012 .

[19]  Bernd Krauskopf,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Interacting Populations , 1998 .

[20]  V. Jansen,et al.  The dynamics of two diffusively coupled predator-prey populations. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  George A K van Voorn,et al.  Heteroclinic orbits indicate overexploitation in predator-prey systems with a strong Allee effect. , 2007, Mathematical biosciences.

[22]  T. Sari,et al.  Is dispersal always beneficial to carrying capacity? New insights from the multi-patch logistic equation. , 2015, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  A. Hastings.  Transient dynamics and persistence of ecological systems , 2001 .

[24]  G. Quaglia,et al.  A two-patch predator-prey metapopulation model , 2012 .

[25]  Ezio Venturino.  Metaecoepidemic models with sound and infected prey migration , 2016, Math. Comput. Simul..

[26]  EFFECTS OF DISPERSAL IN A NON-UNIFORM ENVIRONMENT ON POPULATION DYNAMICS AND COMPETITION: A PATCH MODEL APPROACH , 2014 .

[27]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. , 1993 .

[28]  V. Jansen,et al.  The role of space in reducing predator-prey cycles , 2000 .

[29]  Ezio Venturino,et al.  Metaecoepidemic models: infected and migrating predators , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[30]  Mark Kot,et al.  Elements of Mathematical Ecology , 2001 .

[31]  W. C. Allee.  Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology , 1931 .