The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Zachary M. Smith,et al. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.
[2] Hugh J. McDermott,et al. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[3] Torsten Dau,et al. Prediction of speech intelligibility based on an auditory preprocessing model , 2010, Speech Commun..
[4] J. H. Steiger. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .
[5] Pamela Souza,et al. Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[6] M. Sachs,et al. An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] B Kollmeier,et al. Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] W. S. Rhode,et al. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.
[9] Daniel Fogerty,et al. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Malcolm Slaney,et al. An Efficient Implementation of the Patterson-Holdsworth Auditory Filter Bank , 1997 .
[11] J M Kates,et al. On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Kuldip K. Paliwal,et al. Improving objective intelligibility prediction by combining correlation and coherence based methods with a measure based on the negative distortion ratio , 2012, Speech Commun..
[13] Jesper Jensen,et al. An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[14] Melinda C. Anderson. The role of temporal fine structure in sound quality perception , 2010 .
[15] Hugh J. McDermott. A Technical Comparison of Digital Frequency-Lowering Algorithms Available in Two Current Hearing Aids , 2011, PloS one.
[16] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] James M. Kates,et al. The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) , 2010 .
[18] Andrew Hines,et al. Speech intelligibility from image processing , 2010, Speech Commun..
[19] S. Bacon,et al. Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Brian C J Moore,et al. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] B. Moore,et al. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.
[22] Mounya Elhilali,et al. A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility , 2003, Speech Commun..
[23] S. Zahorian,et al. Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Thomas Lunner,et al. Relationship between distortion and working memory for digital noise-reduction processing in hearing aids , 2013 .
[27] Jesper Jensen,et al. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] Fei Chen,et al. Predicting the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[29] Stuart Rosen,et al. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] B. Moore,et al. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Stefano Cosentino,et al. Towards objective measures of speech intelligibility for Cochlear Implant users in reverberant environments , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA).
[32] B. Moore,et al. Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] P J Abbas,et al. AP measurements of short-term adaptation in normal and in acoustically traumatized ears. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Yôiti Suzuki,et al. Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] James M. Kates. An auditory model for intelligibility and quality predictions , 2013 .
[36] M. Sachs,et al. Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] DeLiang Wang,et al. Speech perception of noise with binary gains. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Raymond L. Goldsworthy,et al. Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] D D Dirks,et al. Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[40] L D Braida,et al. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] T Dau,et al. A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[43] S. Zahorian. Principal‐Components Analysis for Low Redundancy Encoding of Speech Spectra , 1979 .
[44] E. J. Williams. The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .
[45] Thomas F. Quatieri,et al. Speech analysis/Synthesis based on a sinusoidal representation , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..
[46] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] J.C. Rutledge,et al. Frequency lowering processing for listeners with significant hearing loss , 1999, ICECS'99. Proceedings of ICECS '99. 6th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.99EX357).
[48] Karen L. Payton,et al. Analysis of short‐time speech transmission index algorithms , 2008 .
[49] A. Oxenham,et al. Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Pamela E Souza,et al. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[51] James M. Kates,et al. Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.
[52] Ian M. Winter,et al. Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range , 1990, Hearing Research.
[53] G. Carter,et al. Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing , 1973 .
[54] B Kollmeier,et al. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] Fei Chen,et al. Effect of temporal fine structure on speech intelligibility modeling , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
[56] L. V. Immerseel,et al. Digital implementation of linear gammatone filters: Comparison of design methods , 2003 .
[57] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] James M. Kates,et al. A time-domain digital cochlear model , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..
[59] L. Carney,et al. A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] R. Patterson,et al. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[61] Steven Greenberg,et al. What are the Essential Cues for Understanding Spoken Language? , 2001, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..
[62] P. Loizou,et al. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] Satoshi Imai,et al. Cepstral analysis synthesis on the mel frequency scale , 1983, ICASSP.
[64] B C Moore,et al. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] Brian C J Moore,et al. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] P. Dallos,et al. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.
[67] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[68] Thomas F. Quatieri,et al. Speech transformations based on a sinusoidal representation , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..
[69] J C Shaw,et al. An introduction to the coherence function and its use in EEG signal analysis. , 1981, Journal of medical engineering & technology.
[70] Muhammad S A Zilany,et al. Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[71] James M Kates,et al. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[72] Deliang Wang,et al. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[73] Thomas Lunner,et al. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users , 2013, International journal of audiology.
[74] S. Zahorian,et al. Dynamic spectral shape features as acoustic correlates for initial stop consonants , 1991 .