Scale-dependent dynamics: Zooplankton and the stability of freshwater food webs.

The study of freshwater pelagic communities is entering an exciting and controversial phase. Recent efforts to clarify how food web interactions differ from food chain interactions have emphasized the various, often subtle, repercussions of top predators on communities. Predators can modify community structure not only through directly imposed death rates, but also through direct and indirect effects on prey interactions, behavior, life-styles and morphology (e.g. induction of defenses). In some cases, the effects influence ecosystem properties (material fluxes, turnover rates and primary production). Attempts to trace food web impacts in enclosure and lake studies have revealed important time-dependent system properties. Severe resource limitation of fast variables (phytoplankton and small zooplankton) stabilizes lower trophic levels, whereas the potentially destabilizing effects of fish population oscillations are long compared to the growing season and subject to year-to-year climatic vagaries. The time-scale dependent approach is important because it emphasizes how local (transient) solutions may be more ecologically relevant to stability calculations than overall (global) solutions.

[1]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters , 1986, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[2]  J. Kitchell,et al.  Size‐selective predation, light transmission, and oxygen stratification: Evidence from the recent sediments of manipulated lakes1 , 1980 .

[3]  W. Kerfoot.  Long-Term Replacement Cycles in Cladoceran Communities: A History of Predation , 1981 .

[4]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[5]  David Tilman,et al.  Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients , 1982 .

[6]  C. Walters,et al.  Equilibrium Models for Seasonal Dynamics of Plankton Biomass in Four Oligotrophy Lakes , 1987 .

[7]  W. Kerfoot,et al.  Daphnia‐Phytoplankton Interactions: Density‐Dependent Shifts in Resource Quality , 1988 .

[8]  G. Harris.  Phytoplankton Ecology: Structure, Function and Fluctuation , 1986 .

[9]  J. J. Gilbert.  Suppression of rotifer populations by Daphnia: A review of the evidence, the mechanisms, and the effects on zooplankton community structure1 , 1988 .

[10]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  D. Voss,et al.  Numerical behavior of a zooplankton, phytoplankton and phosphorus system , 1981 .

[12]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Simple Models and Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Complex Interactions in Lake Communities , 2011, Springer New York.

[14]  D. J. Hall,et al.  An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in Fish , 1983 .

[15]  John R. Post,et al.  Trophic Relationships in Freshwater Pelagic Ecosystems , 1986 .

[16]  C. D. Sandgren,et al.  Species‐specific rates of growth and grazing loss among freshwater algae , 1985 .

[17]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[18]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities , 1988 .

[19]  S. Dodson,et al.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton. , 1965, Science.

[20]  Raymond L. Lindeman.  The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology , 1942 .

[21]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  The Temporal Scale of Variance in Limnetic Primary Production , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton , 1984 .

[23]  W. Schaffer.  ECOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION: THE CONSEQUENCES OF REDUCED DIMENSIONALITY IN ECOLOGICAL MODELS' , 1981 .

[24]  K. Porter.  Selective Grazing and Differential Digestion of Algae by Zooplankton , 1973, Nature.