Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of rail track geometry degradation

This paper explores hierarchical Bayesian models that can be used to predict rail track geometry degradation and thus guide planning maintenance and renewal actions. Hierarchical Bayesian models allow great flexibility in their specification, especially if they are combined with conditional autoregressive terms that can take into account spatial dependencies between model parameters. For rail track geometry degradation, conditional autoregressive terms are specified to tackle spatial interactions between consecutive rail track sections in rail track lines. An analysis of inspection, operation and maintenance data from the main Portuguese line (Lisbon–Oporto) motivates and illustrates the proposed predictive models. Inference is then conducted based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation, which is proposed for fitting different model specifications. Finally, model comparison and a sensitivity analysis on prior distribution parameters are assessed.

[1]  A López-Pita,et al.  Evolution of track geometric quality in high-speed lines: Ten years experience of the Madrid-Seville line , 2007 .

[2]  Inmaculada Gallego,et al.  Track deterioration in high-speed railways , 2007 .

[3]  C. Robert,et al.  Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS , 2009 .

[4]  A Hamid,et al.  TRACK-QUALITY INDICES AND TRACK-DEGRADATION MODELS FOR MAINTENANCE-OF-WAY PLANNING , 1981 .

[5]  C B Dean,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal analysis of revascularization odds using smoothing splines , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  W. Gilks,et al.  Adaptive Rejection Sampling for Gibbs Sampling , 1992 .

[7]  R. N. Iyengar,et al.  A new model for non-Gaussian random excitations , 1993 .

[8]  T-L Yang,et al.  ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF TRACK-GEOMETRY VARIATIONS , 1982 .

[9]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[10]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  BAYESIAN OUTPUT ANALYSIS PROGRAM (BOA) VERSION 1.1 USER'S MANUAL , 2003 .

[11]  C. Esveld,et al.  Vehicle reactions versus track geometry , 1990, ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads.

[12]  Peter Veit.  Track Quality - Luxury or Necessity? , 2007 .

[13]  Theodore Stathopoulos,et al.  Discussion of “Random Field Modeling of Railway Track Irregularities” by R. N. Iyengar and O. R. Jaiswal , 1997 .

[14]  J. Besag,et al.  On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions , 1995 .

[15]  P. Fonseca Teixeira,et al.  Uncertainty in Rail-Track Geometry Degradation: Lisbon-Oporto Line Case Study , 2011 .

[16]  R. N. Iyengar,et al.  Random Field Modeling of Railway Track Irregularities , 1995 .

[17]  Jianmin Zhao,et al.  Optimizing Policies of Railway Ballast Tamping and Renewal , 2006 .

[18]  C. Esveld.  Modern railway track , 1989 .

[19]  A. Gelman.  Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[20]  Yu-Jiang Zhang,et al.  Objective Track Quality Indices , 2004 .

[21]  Alan J Bing,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF RAILROAD TRACK DEGRADATION MODELS , 1983 .

[22]  J C Corbin,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED TRACK-QUALITY MEASURES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO MAINTENANCE-OF-WAY PLANNING , 1981 .

[23]  J. Besag.  Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[24]  E Schnieder,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of railway track geometry deterioration and restoration , 2012 .

[25]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .