Inherent safety assessment framework for process design using numerical and graphical techniques

Plants should be designed so that they exhibit good safety features to prevent accidents. This can be done by preventing the presence of hazards in the process during its design stages or also known as the inherent safety concept. This research proposes an inherent safety assessment framework for early process design stage. This framework consists of two inherent safety assessment techniques and one hazard prevention strategy. Both inherent safety assessment techniques can be integrated to be used together or as a standalone technique. However, the usage of one or both of these techniques must be followed by the hazard prevention strategy that will provide suggestions on hazard prevention for the hazards identified by the two inherent safety assessment techniques. The first technique is the extended graphical and numerical descriptive (GRAND) technique which is an extension of the previously developed GRAND method through the addition of the two dimensional graphical rating (2DGR) for inherent safety rating and the two dimensional inherent safety and economic graphical rating (2DISEGR) for economic evaluation. The 2DISEGR for methyl methacrylate (MMA) manufacturing process shows that tertiery butyl alcohol (TBA) route is the safest and most profitable process route with the highest net profit margin of 97% at low GRAND total score value of 371. At similar GRAND total score of 371, the 2DGR for MMA manufacturing process shows that TBA is the least hazardous route due to the low number of most hazardous parameter of 1. The second technique is the inherent safety assessment for preliminary design stage (ISAPEDS) technique. This technique consists of three inherent safety parameters which are flammability, explosiveness, and toxicity in relations to operating conditions. The evaluation is done on every equipment in the process flow diagram. ISAPEDS assessment shows that all equipment are identified as the most hazardous in the hydrodealkylation process of toluene to produce benzene. The hazard prevention strategy was developed through the utilization of thematic analysis to extract hazard prevention strategies from the accident databases producing results in the form of keywords that are called themes and generated codes. The 2DISEGR-ISAPEDS figure was developed to show the relationship between the inherent safety assessment using the parameter scores and the economic evaluation using the numerical values. The results of the 2DISEGRISAPEDS show that storage tank (V101) is ranked in the economically least preferred and most hazardous region due to high ISAPEDS total score value of about 200 and minimum economic preference factor value of 0.38. Hazard mitigation themes for strategies identified for V101 are design, operating, chemicals and control. These strategies and their generated codes can be used to maintain the balance between hazard reduction and economical benefit. High similarity that can be seen between this framework and other available inherent safety assessment techniques in the comparison made proves the effectiveness as well as the validity of this framework. In conclusion, this research has achieved its main objective to develop an inherent safety assessment framework for early stage of process design.

[1]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Resolving inherent safety conflict using quantitative and qualitative technique , 2016 .

[2]  Warren D. Seider,et al.  Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation , 1998 .

[3]  Syaza Izyanni Ahmad Numerical and graphical descriptive technique for inherent safety assessment in petrochemical industry , 2014 .

[4]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Level of Learning from Occupational Safety Accidents: Current Status in Malaysia , 2015 .

[5]  Shahid Abbas Abbasi,et al.  Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system , 1998 .

[6]  Zhi-qiang Zhao,et al.  Preliminary Study on Safety Performance Evaluation of Petrochemical Plant Layout , 2013 .

[7]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Are you fit to continue? Approaching rail systems thinking at the cusp of safety and the apex of performance , 2015 .

[8]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Toxic release consequence analysis tool (TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Qualitative Assessment for Inherently Safer Design (QAISD) at preliminary design stage , 2010 .

[10]  Mohsin Pasha,et al.  Inherently Safe Heat Exchanger Network Design by Consequence Based Analysis , 2016 .

[11]  M. Waern,et al.  Psychiatrists’ experiences of suicide assessment , 2016, BMC Psychiatry.

[12]  Anna-Mari Heikkilä,et al.  Inherent safety in process plant design : an index-based approach , 1999 .

[13]  Dzulkarnain Zaini,et al.  Three-Tier Inherent Safety Quantification (3-TISQ) for Toxic Release at Preliminary Design Stage , 2014 .

[14]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Inherent safety index for proton membrane fuel cell vehicle system , 2016 .

[15]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Using process stream index (PSI) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage , 2012 .

[16]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent safety index module (ISIM) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage , 2008 .

[17]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent risk assessment—A new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage , 2009 .

[18]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Safety Weighted Hazard Index (SWeHI): A New, User-friendly Tool for Swift yet Comprehensive Hazard Identification and Safety Evaluation in Chemical Process Industrie , 2001 .

[19]  Natassia Goode,et al.  Do not blame the driver: a systems analysis of the causes of road freight crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Karin Laumann,et al.  Interorganizational complexity and organizational accident risk: A literature review , 2016 .

[21]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Origin of equipment design and operation errors , 2012 .

[22]  Sumit K. Lodhia,et al.  The BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Exploring the link between social and environmental disclosures and reputation risk management , 2017 .

[23]  Janet Anderson,et al.  Learning from patient safety incidents in incident review meetings: Organisational factors and indicators of analytic process effectiveness , 2015 .

[24]  James H. Clarke,et al.  A preliminary analysis of Key Issues in chemical industry accident reports , 2016 .

[25]  Аrcady A. Kossoy,et al.  Simulation-based approach to design of inherently safer processes , 2012 .

[26]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Evaluating hazard conflicts using inherently safer design concept , 2013 .

[27]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  IT Development: , 1966, Current History.

[29]  David John,et al.  Development of risk‐based process safety indicators , 2009 .

[30]  D. Cramer,et al.  Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology , 2005 .

[31]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[32]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk-based process plant design considering inherent safety , 2014 .

[33]  Zoe Nivolianitou,et al.  Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the major accident reporting system (MARS). , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[34]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)-entropy Methodology for Inherent Safety Design Decision Making Tool☆ , 2016 .

[35]  I. S. Salleh,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data Systematically using Thematic Analysis for Deodoriser Troubleshooting in Palm Oil Refining , 2017 .

[36]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Technical Analysis of Accident in Chemical Process Industry and Lessons Learnt , 2010 .

[37]  Faisal Khan,et al.  I2SI: A comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation , 2005 .

[38]  Rajagopalan Srinivasan,et al.  A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benign-ness of chemical process routes in early design stages , 2008 .

[39]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An Approach for Solvent Selection in Extractive Distillation Systems Including Safety Considerations , 2014 .

[40]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Assessing the hazards from a BLEVE and minimizing its impacts using the inherent safety concept , 2016 .

[41]  Nir Keren,et al.  Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases , 2007 .

[42]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[43]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Choosing sustainable technologies. Implications of the underlying sustainability paradigm in the decision-making process , 2015 .

[44]  Arturo Jiménez-Gutiérrez,et al.  Risk Analysis Applied to Bioethanol Dehydration Processes: Azeotropic Distillation versus Extractive Distillation , 2015 .

[45]  Ngwatung Akamangwa,et al.  Working for the environment and against safety: How compliance affects health and safety on board ships , 2016 .

[46]  Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof,et al.  Determining the Effect of an Engineering Overview Assignment on First-Year Students , 2014 .

[47]  P. K. Marhavilas,et al.  Developing a new alternative risk assessment framework in the work sites by including a stochastic and a deterministic process: A case study for the Greek Public Electric Power Provider , 2012 .

[48]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Comparison of methods assessing environmental friendliness of petrochemical process design , 2014 .

[49]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  A graphical method for assessing inherent safety during research and development phase of process design , 2016 .

[50]  A. Hunka,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of pesticides in the EU: what factors and groups influence policy changes? , 2015 .

[51]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent fire consequence estimation tool (IFCET) for preliminary design of process plant , 2013 .

[52]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study , 2006 .

[53]  Karin Laumann,et al.  Task complexity as a performance shaping factor: A review and recommendations in Standardized Plant Analysis Risk-Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) adaption , 2015 .

[54]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[55]  Shuzo Murakami,et al.  Development of a comprehensive city assessment tool: CASBEE-City , 2011 .

[56]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent risk assessment methodology in preliminary design stage: A case study for toxic release , 2013 .

[57]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Design as a contributor to chemical process accidents , 2012 .

[58]  G. A. Melhem,et al.  A guide to the legal framework of the PSM standard for engineers , 2013 .

[59]  M. Hristova,et al.  CALCULATION OF FLASH POINTS AND FLAMMABILITY LIMITS OF SUBSTANCES AND MIXTURES , 2006 .

[60]  Jai P. Gupta,et al.  Inherently Safer Design—Present and Future , 2002 .

[61]  B. J. Tyler Using the mond index to measure inherent hazards , 1985 .

[62]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage , 2010 .

[63]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Identifying safety beliefs among Australian electrical workers , 2016 .

[64]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Method for identifying contributors to chemical process accidents , 2013 .

[65]  Kent Jacob Nielsen,et al.  Negotiating safety practice in small construction companies , 2015 .

[66]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Numerical Descriptive Inherent Safety Technique (NuDIST) for inherent safety assessment in petrochemical industry , 2014 .

[67]  Markku Hurme,et al.  Accident prevention approach throughout process design life cycle , 2014 .

[68]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROCESS EQUIPMENT FAILURES IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY , 2015 .

[69]  Haslenda Hashim,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF MAJOR ACCIDENT IN THE US CHEMICAL SAFETY BOARD (CSB) DATABASE , 2015 .

[70]  Hassim Mimi Haryani,et al.  Screening alternative chemical routes based on inherent chemical process properties data: Methyl methacrylate case study , 2009 .

[71]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Statistical analysis of contributors to chemical process accidents , 2013 .

[72]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Supporting the selection of process and plant design options by Inherent Safety KPIs , 2012 .

[73]  Rafiqul Gani,et al.  A combined heuristic and indicator-based methodology for design of sustainable chemical process plants , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[74]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  APPLICATION OF RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY , 2015 .

[75]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Analysis of equipment failures as contributors to chemical process accidents , 2013 .

[76]  Gary F. Bennett 1. Dow's fire and explosion index hazard classification guide : American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 5th edition, 1981, 57 pp., $10 (Member), $20 (Other). , 1981 .

[77]  Omid Kalatpour,et al.  The content analysis of emergency scenarios: Thematic survey of the context in the process industries , 2017 .

[78]  Valerie O’Keeffe Saying and doing: CALD workers’ experience of communicating safety in aged care , 2016 .

[79]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .