Online serendipity: A contextual differentiation of antecedents and outcomes

Critics worry that algorithmic filtering could lead to overly polished, homogeneous web experiences. “Serendipity,” in turn, has been touted as an antidote. Yet, the desirability of serendipity could vary by context, as users may be more or less receptive depending on the services they employ. We propose a nomological model of online serendipity experiences, conceptualizing both cognitive and behavioral antecedents. Based on a survey of 1,173 German Internet users, we conduct structural equation modeling and multigroup analyses to differentiate the antecedents and effects of serendipity across three distinct contexts: online shopping, information services, and social networking sites. Our findings confirm that antecedents and outcomes of digital serendipity vary by context, with serendipity only being associated with user satisfaction in the context of social network sites.

[1]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality , 2011, IMC '11.

[2]  Mitesh Patel,et al.  Accessing the deep web , 2007, CACM.

[3]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity , 2009, C&C '09.

[4]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Anita Elberse.  Should You Invest in the Long Tail , 2008 .

[6]  Han Yi,et al.  Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions , 2003, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[7]  Anabel Quan-Haase.  Serendipity Models: How We Encounter Information and People in Digital Environments , 2013 .

[8]  Steven M. Bellovin,et al.  A study of privacy settings errors in an online social network , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[9]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era , 2004 .

[10]  Tao Sun,et al.  Unexpected Relevance: An Empirical Study of Serendipity in Retweets , 2013, ICWSM.

[11]  Jason Martin,et al.  Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Information encountering : an exploration beyond information seeking , 1995 .

[13]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  On serendipity and organizing , 2010 .

[15]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  The New Boundaries of Search Serendipity in Digital Environments , 2014 .

[16]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Christian Pieter Hoffmann,et al.  Content creation on the Internet: a social cognitive perspective on the participation divide , 2015 .

[18]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[19]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Are e-books replacing print books? tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across academic social media content serendipitously , 2012, ASIST.

[22]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[23]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search , 2009, CHI.

[24]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[26]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  John M. Budd.  Research in the Two Cultures: The Nature of Scholarship in Science and the Humanities , 1989 .

[28]  William M. Grove,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus , 2011 .

[29]  Christoph Lutz,et al.  Public Service Media in the Digital Age| Diversity by Choice: Applying a Social Cognitive Perspective to the Role of Public Service Media in the Digital Age , 2015 .

[30]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  D. Boyd,et al.  Sociality Through Social Network Sites , 2013 .

[32]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[33]  Michael Netter,et al.  Privacy Settings in Online Social Networks -- Preferences, Perception, and Reality , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  The customer economics of internet privacy , 2002 .

[35]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 2: A classification framework , 2012, J. Documentation.

[36]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[37]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Changing Chance Encounters: Historians, Serendipity, and the Digital Text , 2016 .

[39]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook , 2013, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[40]  Lori McCay-Peet,et al.  INVESTIGATING WORK-RELATED SERENDIPITY, WHAT INFLUENCES IT,AND HOW IT MAY BE FACILITATED IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[41]  B. De Gorter.  THE PRINCIPLES AND POSSIBILITIES OF DIAZO‐COPYING PROCESSES , 1949 .

[42]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[43]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Tracking serendipitous interactions: how individual cultures shape the office , 2013, CSCW.

[44]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS : WHY WE DISCLOSE , 2012 .

[45]  P. Andel.  Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[46]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[47]  K. Sheehan,et al.  Dimensions of Privacy Concern among Online Consumers , 2000 .

[48]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[49]  G. B. Parks.  Serendipity and the Three Princes: From the Peregrinaggio of 1557.Theodore G. Remer , 1968, Renaissance Quarterly.

[50]  Ravi Sharma,et al.  A Knowledge Framework for Development: Empirical Investigation of 30 Societies , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[51]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  Social Serendipity: Proximity Sensing and Cueing , 2004 .

[52]  Abigail McBirnie,et al.  Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[53]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Accessibility of information on the web , 1999, Nature.

[54]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[55]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[56]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  On Chi-Square Difference and z Tests in Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis when the Base Model is Misspecified , 2004 .

[57]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis , 2011, Inf. Res..

[58]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment, and individual differences , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[59]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[60]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2014, MIS Q..

[61]  Eric Gossett,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2015 .

[62]  Toine Bogers,et al.  Micro-serendipity: Meaningful Coincidences in Everyday Life Shared on Twitter , 2013 .

[63]  Fred Rowland,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You (review) , 2011 .

[64]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Case of the Floppy-Eared Rabbits: An Instance of Serendipity Gained and Serendipity Lost , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[66]  Guy Shani,et al.  Evaluating Recommendation Systems , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[67]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy , 2003 .

[68]  David Bawden,et al.  Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts , 2001, J. Documentation.

[69]  David Bawden,et al.  The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[70]  A. Göritz,et al.  Perceived trustworthiness of online shops , 2008 .

[71]  Ágústa Pálsdóttir,et al.  The connection between purposive information seeking and information encountering: A study of Icelanders' health and lifestyle information seeking , 2010, J. Documentation.

[72]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[73]  Gerald Cryer.  Managing serendipity , 1989 .

[74]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[75]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices , 2008 .

[76]  Michael R. Mullen.  Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[77]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[79]  M. Baum,et al.  Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse , 2007 .

[80]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[81]  B Prahl-Andersen,et al.  [New boundaries]. , 2004, Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde.