Omics-based input and output in the development and use of adverse outcome pathways

Abstract Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are pragmatic tools in toxicology and risk assessment with broad potential. AOPs are designed to provide a clear-cut mechanistic representation of toxicological effects that span over different layers of biological organization. AOPs share a common structure consisting of a molecular initiating event, a series of key events connected by key event relationships and an adverse outcome. AOPs can serve a number of purposes pertinent to safety assessment of chemicals, such as the establishment of quantitative structure–activity relationships, the development of novel in vitro toxicity screening tests, and the elaboration of prioritization strategies. Development of AOPs ideally complies with guidelines issued by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Omics, in particular transcriptomics, plays a major role in the establishment and application of AOPs by defining key events and by providing biomarkers for toxicity screening, respectively.

[1]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  An integrative data mining approach to identifying adverse outcome pathway signatures. , 2016, Toxicology.

[2]  G. Folkers,et al.  Incidence of drug-induced liver injury in medical inpatients , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[3]  A. B. Hill The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[4]  Shannon M. Bell,et al.  Accelerating Adverse Outcome Pathway Development Using Publicly Available Data Sources , 2016, Current Environmental Health Reports.

[5]  Stan Gaj,et al.  Integrating multiple omics to unravel mechanisms of Cyclosporin A induced hepatotoxicity in vitro. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[6]  M E Meek,et al.  New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[7]  M Younes,et al.  IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  R Jeffrey Lewis,et al.  Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence , 2014, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[9]  T. Vanhaecke,et al.  Omics-based responses induced by bosentan in human hepatoma HepaRG cell cultures , 2018, Archives of Toxicology.

[10]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  Anne Gourmelon,et al.  The Adverse Outcome Pathway Concept: A Basis for Developing Regulatory Decision-making Tools , 2016, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[12]  Francesco Falciani,et al.  Adverse Outcome Pathways for Regulatory Applications: Examination of Four Case Studies With Different Degrees of Completeness and Scientific Confidence. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  Yu-Mei Tan,et al.  Adverse Outcome Pathways—Organizing Toxicological Information to Improve Decision Making , 2016, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[14]  Sharon Munn,et al.  Adverse outcome pathway development II: best practices. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  Richard A Becker,et al.  Proposing a scientific confidence framework to help support the application of adverse outcome pathways for regulatory purposes. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Integrating Publicly Available Data to Generate Computationally Predicted Adverse Outcome Pathways for Fatty Liver. , 2016, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Increasing Scientific Confidence in Adverse Outcome Pathways: Application of Tailored Bradford-Hill Considerations for Evaluating Weight of Evidence. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  Imran Shah,et al.  Development of an adverse outcome pathway from drug-mediated bile salt export pump inhibition to cholestatic liver injury. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[19]  Sharon Munn,et al.  Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[20]  Thomas Shafee,et al.  Transcriptomics technologies , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Jan G. Hengstler,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: a concise introduction for toxicologists , 2017, Archives of Toxicology.

[22]  William M. Lee Drug-induced acute liver failure. , 2013, Clinics in liver disease.

[23]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Applying Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) to support Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA). , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  Zachary A. Collier,et al.  A weight of evidence assessment approach for adverse outcome pathways. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[25]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment , 2015, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[26]  Scott C. Wesselkamper,et al.  Editor's Highlight: Application of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis for Identification of Chemically Induced, Biologically Relevant Transcriptomic Networks and Potential Utilization in Human Health Risk Assessment , 2017, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Development of novel tools for the in vitro investigation of drug-induced liver injury , 2015, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.