Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies.

We investigated whether short durations (5 minutes) of exposure to distorted bodies can change subsequent perceptions of attractiveness and normality. Participants rated 110 female bodies, varying in width, on either their attractiveness or normality before and after exposure to either extremely narrow (-50% of original width in Experiments 1 and 2) or extremely wide bodies (+50% of original width in Experiment 1, and +70% of original width in Experiment 2). In both experiments, the most attractive and most normal looking bodies became significantly and substantially narrower after exposure to narrow bodies. The most normal looking body changed significantly after exposure to wide bodies, but the most attractive body did not. These results show that perceptions of body attractiveness can be influenced by experience, but that there is an asymmetry between the effects of exposure to narrow and wide bodies. We consider a possible mechanism for this unexpected asymmetry, as well as possible implications for the effects of media exposure on body-image. The most attractive body shape was consistently narrower than the most normal looking body shape. Substantial changes in what looked normal were accompanied by congruent changes in what looked attractive, suggesting that a normal or average body shape may function as a reference point against which body attractiveness is judged.

[1]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Fitting the mind to the World , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  C. Clifford,et al.  Pulling Faces: An Investigation of the Face-Distortion Aftereffect , 2003, Perception.

[3]  G. Rhodes,et al.  It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and their Origins , 2002 .

[5]  F. Marlowe,et al.  Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology , 2001 .

[6]  Kristen Harrison,et al.  The body electric: thin‐ideal media and eating disorders in adolescents , 2000 .

[7]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The Attractiveness of Nonface Averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[8]  M. Tovée,et al.  Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body? , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[9]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Philip J. Benson,et al.  A computer-graphic technique for the study of body size perception and body types , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  F. Marlowe,et al.  How Universal Are Preferences for Female Waist-to-Hip Ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania , 1999 .

[14]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Body and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality? , 1999 .

[15]  M. Tovée,et al.  Visual cues to female physical attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[17]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[18]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? , 1998, Nature.

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[20]  L. Tassinary,et al.  A Critical Test of the Waist-to-Hip-Ratio Hypothesis of Female Physical Attractiveness , 1998 .

[21]  R. Thornhill,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY, DISEASE AND MEDICINE , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  A. Furnham,et al.  Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension , 1997 .

[23]  Kristen Harrison,et al.  The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders , 1997 .

[24]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness , 1996 .

[25]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio , 1995 .

[26]  Ronald Henss Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension , 1995 .

[27]  E. Stice,et al.  Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: an examination of mediating mechanisms. , 1994, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[29]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human facial beauty , 1993, Human nature.

[30]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  H. Hoyme,et al.  Minor anomalies: Diagnostic clues to aberrant human morphogenesis , 1993, Genetica.

[32]  D. Regan,et al.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size , 1992, Vision Research.

[33]  Ann O’leary,et al.  Adaptation to form distortion of a familiar shape , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  H. Markus,et al.  Possible selves and delinquency. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[36]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple , 1990, Cognition.

[37]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[38]  Colin Martindale,et al.  Priming, prototypicality, and preference. , 1988 .

[39]  B. Silverstein,et al.  The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women , 1986 .

[40]  T. Whitfield,et al.  The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. , 1979 .

[41]  M. Snyder On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[42]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  J. Bransford,et al.  Abstraction of visual patterns. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Sarah K. Murnen,et al.  The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, The International journal of eating disorders.

[47]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[48]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[50]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness , 1994 .

[51]  James E. Mosimann,et al.  Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. , 1992 .