Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy.

BACKGROUND The clinical differentiation between lentigo senilis/initial seborrheic keratosis and lentigo maligna on the face can be difficult. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to determine whether dermatoscopy (eg, skin surface microscopy at 10x magnification) can reliably differentiate between these entities. METHODS Dermatoscopic slides of 87 consecutive patients presenting 37 malignant and 50 benign pigmented skin lesions on the face were analyzed with the use of 27 dermatoscopic criteria. RESULTS Univariate analysis selected two criteria specific for lentigo maligna: asymmetric pigmented follicular openings and dark (brown or black) rhomboidal structures. Location-specific importance in relation to facial location was attributed to the color "slate-gray, " especially in combination with structures such as dots, globules, streaks, and homogeneous areas. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression model) revealed the 4 most important features to be asymmetric pigmented follicular openings, dark rhomboidal structures, slate-gray globules, and slate-gray dots with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION Three conclusions can be drawn from our study: With a set of 4 dermatoscopic features, early lentigo maligna can be detected with high accuracy; dermatoscopic features on the face differ from criteria used in other locations; and our progression growth model for lentigo maligna delineates the different steps of malignant growth in lentigo maligna.

[1]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  A. Dorevitch,et al.  Lentigo maligna is more common on the driver's side. , 1993, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  H. Cohen,et al.  Malignant melanoma in the elderly. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Wilhelm Stolz,et al.  Color Atlas of Dermatoscopy , 1991 .

[5]  Josef Smolle,et al.  Diagnostic reliability of dermoscopic criteria for detecting malignant melanoma. , 1995 .

[6]  J. Weiss,et al.  Malignant melanoma in southern Germany: different predictive value of risk factors for melanoma subtypes. , 1991, Dermatologica.

[7]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. II. Diagnosis of small pigmented skin lesions and early detection of malignant melanoma. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[8]  D. English,et al.  MELANOMA IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA IN 1980‐81: INCIDENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HISTOLOGICAL TYPES , 1987, Pathology.

[9]  L. Cohen,et al.  Lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  Michael Landthaler,et al.  SKIN SURFACE MICROSCOPY , 1989, The Lancet.

[11]  K. Magnus Habits of sun exposure and risk of malignant melanoma: An analysis of incidence rates in Norway 1955–1977 by cohort, sex, age, and primary tumor site , 1981, Cancer.

[12]  H Kerl,et al.  Surface Microscopy: A New Approach to the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Pigmented Tumors , 1989, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[13]  C. Hertzman,et al.  The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma with the use of sunbeds and sunlamps. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Epidemiology of pre‐invasive and invasive malignant melanoma in Western Australia , 1980, International journal of cancer.

[15]  A. Kopf,et al.  Histopathologic Correlates of Structures Seen on Dermoscopy (Epiluminescence Microscopy) , 1993, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[16]  C. Garbe [The sun and malignant melanoma]. , 1992, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[17]  Otto Braun-Falco Color Atlas of Dermatoscopy , 1994 .