A comparative analysis between the tracking solutions implemented on a photovoltaic string

The paper deals with a comparative analysis (in terms of energetic efficiency) between the mono-axis and dual-axis tracking solutions implemented on a photovoltaic (PV) string. The study reveals which solution is more efficient in the geographical area of Brasov, and under which conditions. The tracking efficiencies of the mono-axis and dual-axis systems are compared considering two orientation programs: seasonal and annual. Taking into account the technical and economical aspects, besides the energy gain of the dual-axis system, it was concluded that a mono-axis tracking system is preferred for the studied geographical area. The study is performed by using the virtual prototype of the PV tracking system, which is approached in mechatronic concept. An algorithm for the optimal design of the step-by-step tracking law is also developed, the maximization of the energetic efficiency of the PV string with solar tracker being the optimization goal. Finally, experimental data are used to validate the simulation results.

[1]  Pascal Fahl,et al.  Tracking benefits for solar collectors installed in Bangalore , 2011 .

[2]  Emanuele Calabrò,et al.  An Algorithm to Determine the Optimum Tilt Angle of a Solar Panel from Global Horizontal Solar Radiation , 2013 .

[3]  Cătălin Alexandru,et al.  Optimal design of the solar tracker used for a photovoltaic string , 2013 .

[4]  Farzad Jafarkazemi,et al.  The optimum tilt angle for flat-plate solar collectors in Iran , 2012 .

[5]  Murat Orhun,et al.  A remotely accessible solar tracker system design , 2014 .

[6]  Oscar Altuzarra,et al.  Design of a solar tracking parallel mechanism with low energy consumption , 2015 .

[7]  Matthew W. Dunnigan,et al.  Comparison between open- and closed-loop trackers of a solar photovoltaic system , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Clean Energy and Technology (CEAT).

[8]  Gorazd Štumberger,et al.  A novel prediction algorithm for solar angles using solar radiation and Differential Evolution for dual-axis sun tracking purposes , 2011 .

[9]  G. Štumberger,et al.  Maximum Efficiency Trajectories of a Two-Axis Sun Tracking System Determined Considering Tracking System Consumption , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[10]  Cătălin Alexandru,et al.  Dynamic optimization of the tracking system for a pseudo-azimuthal photovoltaic platform , 2012 .

[11]  Emanuele Calabrò,et al.  Determining optimum tilt angles of photovoltaic panels at typical north-tropical latitudes , 2009 .

[12]  Cătălin Alexandru,et al.  Simulation of a dual-axis solar tracker for improving the performance of a photovoltaic panel , 2010 .

[13]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  A State Space Technique for Optimal Design of Mechanisms , 1982 .

[14]  Mohammad Saad Alam,et al.  Dynamic modeling of photovoltaic module for real-time maximum power tracking , 2010 .

[15]  Yusuf Al-Turki,et al.  Performance of Dual-Axis Solar Tracker versus Static Solar System by Segmented Clearness Index in Malaysia , 2013 .

[16]  Mustafa Engin,et al.  Optimization Controller for Mechatronic Sun Tracking System to Improve Performance , 2013 .

[17]  Sinan Kivrak.  Design of a low cost sun tracking controller system for photovoltaic panels , 2013 .

[18]  Cătălin Alexandru.  A Novel Open-Loop Tracking Strategy for Photovoltaic Systems , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.