On the practical merits of rank constrained ML estimator of structured covariance matrices

Estimation of the disturbance or interference covariance matrix plays a central role on radar target detection in the presence of clutter, noise and jammer. The disturbance covariance matrix should be inferred from training sample observations in practice. Traditional maximum likelihood (ML) estimators lead degraded false alarm and detection performance in the realistic regime of limited training. For this reason, informed estimators have been actively researched. Recently, a new estimator [1] that explicitly incorporates rank information of the clutter subspace was proposed. This paper reports significant new analytical and experimental investigations on the rank-constrained maximum likelihood (RCML) estimator. First, we show that the RCML estimation problem formulated in [1] has a closed form. Next, we perform new and rigorous experimental evaluation in the form of reporting: 1.) probability of detection versus signal to noise ratio (SNR), and 2.) SINR performance under heterogeneous (target corrupted) training data. In each case, we compare against widely used existing estimators and show that exploiting the rank information has significant practical merits in robust estimation.

[1]  A. Haimovich,et al.  The eigencanceler: adaptive radar by eigenanalysis methods , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  Muralidhar Rangaswamy,et al.  Statistical analysis of the nonhomogeneity detector for non-Gaussian interference backgrounds , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  R. Klemm Principles of Space-Time Adaptive Processing , 2002 .

[4]  Augusto Aubry,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Structured Covariance Matrix With a Condition Number Constraint , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  V. Monga,et al.  Rank constrained ML estimation of structured covariance matrices with applications in radar target detection , 2012, 2012 IEEE Radar Conference.

[6]  M.C. Wicks,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing: a knowledge-based perspective for airborne radar , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  W.L. Melvin,et al.  Analyzing space-time adaptive processors using measured data , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[8]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[9]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  Knowledge-Based Radar Detection, Tracking, and Classification: Gini/Radar Detection , 2008 .

[11]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Introduction to Adaptive Arrays , 1980 .

[12]  K. Gerlach,et al.  The enhanced FRACTA algorithm with knowledge-aided covariance estimation , 2004, Processing Workshop Proceedings, 2004 Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal.

[13]  Joseph R. Guerci,et al.  Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Radar , 2003 .

[14]  Karl Gerlach,et al.  Fast converging adaptive processor or a structured covariance matrix , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[15]  K. Gerlach,et al.  Errata: fast converging adaptive processor for a structured covariance matrix , 2001 .

[16]  K. Gerlach,et al.  Robust adaptive signal processing methods for heterogeneous radar clutter scenarios , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Radar Conference (Cat. No. 03CH37474).

[17]  F. Gini,et al.  Knowledge Based Radar Detection, Tracking and Classification , 2008 .

[18]  James Ward,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar , 1998 .

[19]  J.R. Guerci,et al.  Knowledge-aided adaptive radar at DARPA: an overview , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.