The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Lars E. Sjöberg,et al. A solution to the downward continuation effect on the geoid determined by Stokes' formula , 2003 .
[2] L. Sjöberg. Topographic and atmospheric corrections of gravimetric geoid determination with special emphasis on the effects of harmonics of degrees zero and one , 2001 .
[3] N. S. Landkof. Foundations of Modern Potential Theory , 1972 .
[4] Lars E. Sjöberg,et al. A computational scheme to model the geoid by the modified Stokes formula without gravity reductions , 2003 .
[5] Zdenek Martinec,et al. Boundary-Value Problems for Gravimetric Determination of a Precise Geoid , 1998 .
[6] On the error of analytical continuation in physical geodesy , 1996 .
[7] Dru A. Smith. Computing components of the gravity field induced by distant topographic masses and condensed masses over the entire Earth using the 1-D FFT approach , 2002 .
[8] Jonas Ågren,et al. The analytical continuation bias in geoid determination using potential coefficients and terrestrial gravity data , 2004 .
[9] L. Sjöberg. The terrain effect in geoid computation from satellite derived geopotential models , 1996 .
[10] L. Sjöberg. Topographic effects by the Stokes–Helmert method of geoid and quasi-geoid determinations , 2000 .