The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits

This paper combines the concept of weak ties from social network research and the notion of complex knowledge to explain the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits in a multiunit organization. I use a network study of 120 new-product development projects undertaken by 41 divisions in a large electronics company to examine the task of developing new products in the least amount of time. Findings show that weak interunit ties help a project team search for useful knowledge in other subunits but impede the transfer of complex knowledge, which tends to require a strong tie between the two parties to a transfer. Having weak interunit ties speeds up projects when knowledge is not complex but slows them down when the knowledge to be transferred is highly complex. I discuss the implications of these findings for research on social networks and product innovation.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[3]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[4]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[5]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[8]  S. Boorman.  A Combinatorial Optimization Model for Transmission of Job Information through Contact Networks , 1975 .

[9]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[10]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[11]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[12]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[13]  L. Zucker.  The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[16]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[17]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[18]  N. Lin,et al.  Social structure and network analysis , 1985 .

[19]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[20]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[21]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[22]  R. Nelson.  THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[23]  H. Blossfeld.  Techniques of event history modeling , 1989 .

[24]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[25]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[26]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[27]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[28]  B. Wegener,et al.  Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment , 1991 .

[29]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[30]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[31]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[32]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[33]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[34]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[35]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Developer-User Interaction and User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[36]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[37]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[38]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[39]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[40]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[41]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[45]  H. Ibarra.  Race, Opportunity, And Diversity Of Social Circles In Managerial Networks , 1995 .

[46]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[47]  David Knoke,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. , 1996 .

[48]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[49]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .