The effect of technology on learning during the acquisition and development of competencies in technology‐intensive small firms

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider whether the characteristics of a technology affect the type of learning mode used for acquiring abilities related to specific competencies. While technological competencies have a direct impact on firm performance for technology‐intensive start‐ups, few if any of these firms posses all the prerequisite competencies required for a given technology‐product‐market paradigm as the firm enters or remains over time in that market. Consequently, high tech entrepreneurial firms must learn, acquire and develop competencies initially and in response to the changing requirements of industry standard products.Design/methodology/approach – The paper includes a study of all 35 high‐tech start‐ups in the semiconductor silicon industry using primary and secondary source data.Findings – The characteristics of a technology affect which of ten different learning methods are chosen by a firm to acquire a competence. The study finds that risk, uncertainty, status, pervasivene...

[1]  W. Griffiths,et al.  What governs firm-level R&D: Internal or external factors? , 2010 .

[2]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[3]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[4]  John H. Friar,et al.  The emergence of technology strategy , 1985 .

[5]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[6]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[7]  K. Hussinger.  On the Importance of Technological Relatedness: SMEs versus Large Acquisition Targets , 2010 .

[8]  C. Argyris.  Teaching Smart People How to Learn , 2002 .

[9]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[10]  S. Walsh,et al.  Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[14]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Market novelty, competence-seeking and innovation networking , 2009 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[16]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .

[17]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[18]  J. Linton,et al.  From bench to business , 2003, Nature materials.

[19]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[20]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[21]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[22]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Inertia and Transformation , 1995 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[24]  A. L. Frohman,et al.  Managing the Company's Technological Assets , 1980 .

[25]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Competency rallying for technical innovation—The case of the Virtuelle Fabrik , 2008 .

[26]  S. Sitkin.  Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[27]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Chapter 17 – Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge , 1998 .

[28]  K. Marino,et al.  Developing consensus on firm competencies and capabilities , 1996 .

[29]  David J. Collis,et al.  Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s , 1999 .

[30]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[31]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  The firm's trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  The semiconductor silicon industry roadmap: Epochs driven by the dynamics between disruptive technologies and core competencies , 2005 .

[33]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[34]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  "Managed" informal information trading: the oil scout system in oil exploration firms , 2014 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[36]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[37]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior , 2010 .

[38]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[39]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[40]  W. W. Charters,et al.  Barriers to the Innovation Process: Four Case Studies of Differentiated Staffing , 1973 .

[41]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[43]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[44]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[45]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[46]  W. Nord,et al.  Implementing Routine and Radical Inno-vation , 1986 .

[47]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[48]  A L Robinson.  One Billion Transistors on a Chip?: The annual rate of increase in numbers of transistors on a chip is slowing as theoretical limits are neared, but there may be a billion by the year 2000. , 1984, Science.

[49]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[50]  Louis E. Yelle.  THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[51]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[52]  J. Huovinen,et al.  Entrepreneurial learning in the context of portfolio entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[53]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  The Role of Consultants in AMT Implementation , 1992 .

[54]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[55]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[56]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[57]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Informal networking and industrial life cycles , 2000 .

[58]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[59]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology , 2008 .

[60]  A. L. Frohman,et al.  Planning Tools for Effective Research Management in the '80s: Linking Technological and Business Planning , 1981 .

[61]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Innovation Complexity and the Sequence of Innovating Stages , 1985 .

[62]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[63]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[64]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Organizational Learning and Institutional Embeddedness , 1996 .

[65]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Integrating Innovation and Learning Curve Theory: An Enabler for Moving Nanotechnologies and Other Emerging Process Technologies into Production , 2004 .

[66]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .

[67]  W. R. Runyan.  Silicon Semiconductor Technology , 1965 .

[68]  Yi-Fen Huang.  Strategic renewal within an information technology firm: Exploration, exploitation and corporate venturing , 2009 .

[69]  Bin Guo,et al.  Patterns of technological learning within the knowledge systems of industrial clusters in emerging economies: Evidence from China , 2011 .

[70]  L. Prusak.  Knowledge in organizations , 1997 .

[71]  Hans Löfsten,et al.  R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks , 2005 .

[72]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[73]  Jens Ove Riis,et al.  Competence development and technology: How learning and technology can be meaningfully integrated , 1999 .

[74]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[75]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[76]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[77]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[78]  Joshua S. Geller.  Innovation in Organizations. By Richard L. Daft and Selwyn W. Becker. New York: Elsevier, North-Holland, Inc., 1978 , 1979 .

[79]  José Arana Varela,et al.  Relationships among functional units and new product performance: The moderating effect of technological turbulence , 2010 .

[80]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[81]  J. Cockcroft.  The process of technological innovation , 1965 .

[82]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[83]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[84]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[85]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SMEs , 2004 .

[86]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[87]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  The Competence Pyramid: A Framework for Identifying and Analyzing Firm and Industry Competence , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[88]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  The measurement of technical competencies , 2002 .

[89]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Functional importance and company performance: Moderating effects of grand strategy and industry type , 1982 .

[90]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[91]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[92]  D. Ford,et al.  Taking technology to market , 1981 .

[93]  Propositions on cybernetics and social transformation: Implications of von Foerster’s non-trivial machine for knowledge processes , 1996 .

[94]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[95]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[96]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right ‘job’ for your technology , 2010 .

[97]  Carver Mead.  Scaling of MOS technology to submicrometer feature sizes , 1994, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[98]  C. Argyris.  On organizational learning , 1993 .

[99]  Robert Boylan,et al.  The strategic development of HARM manufacturing technologies , 1995 .

[100]  William H. A. Johnson.  Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn , 2008 .

[101]  A. Fusfeld,et al.  Assessing the Value of Your Technology , 1995 .

[102]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[103]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Measuring Success in AMT Implementation Using Customer‐Supplier Interaction Criteria , 1992 .