Implications for the inter-organizational design of environmental care when changing environmental control points

In this paper we try to bridge the gap between two lines of thought within the environmental care literature. We differentiate between two major clusters in this literature; (1) environmental management and (2) strategic approach to environmental care. Although both approaches focus on the same object i.e. management of environmental care, the two bodies of knowledge apply different starting points. The first one focuses on the physical material flow and effects, the second approach starts with the weighing between the opportunities in the environment and the internal organizational possibilities. Our assumption is that the two approaches are complementary. In constructing the bridge we conclude that the approaches are indeed complementary. In combining the two approaches, the starting points can be intertwined. This combination of approaches opens the possibility to relate the physical environment, by means of control points, to the strategic weightings. In this sense, the control points, and in line with that the physical environment together with strategic considerations, form for managers the conditions for their design of inter-organizational environmental care. By altering physical control points and or strategic focus, the inter-organizational design of environmental care will change as well. The integrative framework ends with a table in which ideal typically control points, strategic focus and the inter-organizational design are combined.

[1]  William R. King,et al.  Life‐Cycle Management , 2008 .

[2]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance , 2005 .

[3]  S. Seuring Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains: differences and interrelations , 2004 .

[4]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Co-ordinating Sustainable Cotton Chains for the Mass Market , 2003 .

[5]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  The link between 'green' and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Olof Hjelm,et al.  The Connection Between Environmental Management Systems and Continual Environmental Performance Improvements , 2002 .

[7]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Sustainable Supply Network Management , 2001 .

[9]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development , 2001 .

[10]  Teun Wolters,et al.  Stepping‐stones for integrated chain management in the firm , 1997 .

[11]  Lassi Linnanen,et al.  Life cycle management: Integrated approach towards corporate environmental issues , 1995 .

[12]  Nigel Roome,et al.  Developing environmental management strategies , 1992 .

[13]  N. E. Gallopoulos,et al.  Strategies for Manufacturing , 1989 .

[14]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Integrated chain management in Germany – identifying schools of thought based on a literature review , 2007 .

[15]  W. J. Marcelis,et al.  Organising Life-cycles in Supply Chains: Linking Environmental Performance to Managerial Designs , 2005 .

[16]  André H.J. Nijhof,et al.  Responsible chain management: a capability assessment framework , 2002 .

[17]  Pieternel A. Luning,et al.  Food quality management: a techno-managerial approach. , 2002 .

[18]  N. Migchels The ties that bind. A dynamic model of chain cooperation development , 2001 .

[19]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[20]  C.S.A. van Koppen,et al.  Milieuzorg als strategische keuze: van bedrijfsspecifieke situatie naar milieuzorgsystematiek. , 1998 .

[21]  G. Beers,et al.  Chain science as an emerging discipline. , 1998 .

[22]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT -- MORE THAN A NEW NAME FOR LOGISTICS , 1997 .